The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ς B Activity Depends on RsbU in Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
Derivatives of the widely used laboratory strain Staphylococcus aureus NCTC8325, which are natural rsbU mutants, were shown to be unable to produce RsbU, a positive regulator of the alternative sigma factor ς B . The lack of RsbU prevented the heat-dependent production of ς B -controlled transcripts and resulted in reduced H 2 O 2 and UV tolerance, enhanced alpha-hemolysin activity, and the inability to produce the alkaline shock protein Asp23. After 48 h of growth, rsbU mutant strains failed to accumulate staphyloxanthin, the major stationary-phase carotenoid. Transcription of Asp23 was found to be exclusively controlled by ς B , making it an excellent target for the study of ς B activity in S. aureus . Reporter gene experiments, using the firefly luciferase gene ( luc +) fused to the ς B -dependent promoter(s) of asp23 , revealed that ς B is almost inactive in 8325 derivatives. cis complementation of the 8325 derivative BB255 with the wild-type rsbU gene from strain COL produced the rsbU + derivative GP268, a strain possessing a ς B activity profile comparable to that of the rsbU + wild-type strain Newman. In GP268, the heat inducibility of ς B -dependent genes, Asp23 production, alpha-hemolysin activity, pigmentation, and susceptibility to H 2 O 2 were restored to the levels observed in strain Newman, clearly demonstrating that RsbU is needed for activation of ς B in S. aureus .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Horsburgh, M. J., Aish, J. L., White, I. J., Shaw, L., Lithgow, J. K., & Foster, S. J. (2002) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.184.19.5457-5467.2002 · Cited by 699
Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus Virulence
Jenul, C., & Horswill, A. R. (2019) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0031-2018 · Cited by 549
SigB-Dependent General Stress Response in Bacillus subtilis and Related Gram-Positive Bacteria
Hecker, M., Pané-Farré, J., & Uwe, V. (2007) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093445 · Cited by 474
Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus: complexity and applications
Bronner, S., Monteil, H., & Prévost, G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.09.003 · Cited by 434
Microarray-Based Analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus σBRegulon
Bischoff, M., Dunman, P., Kormanec, J., Macapagal, D., Murphy, E., Mounts, W., Berger-Bächi, B., & Projan, S. (2004) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.186.13.4085-4099.2004 · Cited by 401
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Giachino, P., Engelmann, S., & Bischoff, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-03-15
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1843-1852
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1859475975
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ς B Activity Depends on RsbU in Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.183.6.1843-1852.2001
- The paper
- Giachino, P., Engelmann, S., & Bischoff, M. (2001). ς B Activity Depends on RsbU in Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.183.6.1843-1852.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.