The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whole-Genome Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical and Laboratory Strains
Open accessAbstract
Virulence and immunity are poorly understood in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.We sequenced the complete genome of the M. tuberculosis clinical strain CDC1551 and performed a whole-genome comparison with the laboratory strain H37Rv in order to identify polymorphic sequences with potential relevance to disease pathogenesis, immunity, and evolution. We found large-sequence and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in numerous genes. Polymorphic loci included a phospholipase C, a membrane lipoprotein, members of an adenylate cyclase gene family, and members of the PE/PPE gene family, some of which have been implicated in virulence or the host immune response. Several gene families, including the PE/PPE gene family, also had significantly higher synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution frequencies compared to the genome as a whole. We tested a large sample of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates for a subset of the large-sequence and single-nucleotide polymorphisms and found widespread genetic variability at many of these loci. We performed phylogenetic and epidemiological analysis to investigate the evolutionary relationships among isolates and the origins of specific polymorphic loci. A number of these polymorphisms appear to have occurred multiple times as independent events, suggesting that these changes may be under selective pressure. Together, these results demonstrate that polymorphisms among M. tuberculosis strains are more extensive than initially anticipated, and genetic variation may have an important role in disease pathogenesis and immunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence
Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31159 · Cited by 7,847
Alm, R. A., Ling, L.-S. L., Moir, D. T., King, B. L., Brown, E. D., Doig, P. C., Smith, D. R., Noonan, B., Guild, B. C., deJonge, B. L., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/16495 · Cited by 1,893
Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis
Mahairas, G. G., Sabo, P. J., Hickey, M. J., Singh, D. C., & Stover, C. K. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.5.1274-1282.1996 · Cited by 1,103
Cited by
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
Self-citationCell-Mediated Immune Responses in Tuberculosis
Cooper, A. M. (2009) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132703 · Cited by 1,162
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis and Molecular Determinants of Virulence
Smith, I. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.3.463-496.2003 · Cited by 1,154
The Population Genetics of dN/dS
Kryazhimskiy, S., & Plotkin, J. B. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304 · Cited by 962
“This observation holds for bacterial data [11,12,14,16,18], for viral samples isolated from a single host versus viral samples isolated from different hosts [13], for closely related viral samples versus distantly diverged samples [48], and for conspecific versus interspecific mammalian sequences [49,50].”
BackgroundAncient Origin and Gene Mosaicism of the Progenitor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Gutierrez, M. C., Brisse, S., Brosch, R., Fabre, M., Omaïs, B., Marmiesse, M., Supply, P., & Vincent, V. (2005) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0010005 · Cited by 646
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleischmann, R. D., Alland, D., Eisen, J. A., Carpenter, L., White, O., Peterson, J., DeBoy, R., Dodson, R., Gwinn, M., Haft, D., Hickey, E., Kolonay, J. F., Nelson, W. C., Umayam, L. A., Ermolaeva, M., Salzberg, S. L., Delcher, A., Utterback, T., Weidman, J., Khouri, H., Gill, J., Mikula, A., Bishai, W., Jacobs, Venter, J. C., & Fraser, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5479-5490
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2011261850
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 35.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whole-Genome Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical and Laboratory Strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.184.19.5479-5490.2002
- The paper
- Fleischmann, R. D., Alland, D., Eisen, J. A., Carpenter, L., White, O., Peterson, J., DeBoy, R., Dodson, R., Gwinn, M., Haft, D., Hickey, E., Kolonay, J. F., Nelson, W. C., Umayam, L. A., Ermolaeva, M., Salzberg, S. L., Delcher, A., Utterback, T., Weidman, J., . . . Fraser, C. M. (2002). Whole-Genome Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical and Laboratory Strains. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.184.19.5479-5490.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.