The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A SELECTIVE MEDIUM FOR THE ISOLATION AND ENUMERATION OF ORAL AND FECAL LACTOBACILLI
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Where high populations of lactococci are expected in conjunction with lacticaseibacilli; such as is the case with cheese LBS is the medium of choice.”
From Protection of candidate probiotic lactobacilli by Cheddar cheese matrix during simulated gastrointestinal digestion (2022) · cites this paper as Rogosa et al., 1951
In the citing paper
“MRS and LBS, based on the work of Rogosa et al (1951) are designed to support the growth of lacticaseibacilli.The key difference between both media is that LBS contains ammonium citrate, sodium acetate, acetic acid and ferrous sulphate that act as inhibitors of lactococci and provide a low pH environment which is tolerated by lactobacilli.”
From Protection of candidate probiotic lactobacilli by Cheddar cheese matrix during simulated gastrointestinal digestion (2022) · cites this paper as Rogosa et al., 1951
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli
De MAN, J. C., ROGOSA, M., & SHARPE, M. E. (1960) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x · Cited by 5,311
Self-citationThe first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota
Rajilić-Stojanović, M., & de Vos, W. M. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12075 · Cited by 1,182
“Specific media, developed already in the 1950s (Rogosa et al., 1951), enabled the isolation of numerous Lactobacillus spp.”
BackgroundTeuber, M. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527620999.ch10 · Cited by 738
Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?
Russell, J. B., & Wilson, D. B. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76510-4 · Cited by 628
Russell, J. B. (1992) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb04990.x · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogosa, M., Mitchell, J. A., & Wiseman, R. F.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1951-07
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 132-133
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- PMC
- PMC386093
- OpenAlex
- W1589430658
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 26.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Bacteriology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- lactobacilli, selective culture media, bacterial isolation, oral bacteria, fecal bacteria, lactic acid bacteria
- MeSH terms
- Feces, Humans, Lactobacillus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
