The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida spp. by Use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Broth Microdilution Methods, 2010 to 2012
Open accessAbstract
Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida has been standardized and refined and now may play a useful role in managing Candida infections. Important new developments include validation of 24-h reading times for all antifungal agents and the establishment of species-specific epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for the systemically active antifungal agents and both common and uncommon species of Candida . The clinical breakpoints (CBPs) for fluconazole, voriconazole, and the echinocandins have been revised to provide species-specific interpretive criteria for the six most common species. The revised CBPs not only are predictive of clinical outcome but also provide a more sensitive means of identifying those strains with acquired or mutational resistance mechanisms. This brief review serves as an update on the new developments in the antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Fungal infections generally follow the”
From Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D., Benjamin, D. K., Calandra, T. F., Edwards, J. E., Filler, S. G., Fisher, J. F., Kullberg, B.-J., Zeichner, L. O., et al. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/596757 · Cited by 3,191
Ghannoum, M. A., & Rice, L. B. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.4.501 · Cited by 1,811
Comparison of Caspofungin and Amphotericin B for Invasive Candidiasis
Mora-Duarte, J., Betts, R., Rotstein, C., Colombo, A. L., Thompson-Moya, L., Smietana, J., Lupinacci, R., Sable, C., Kartsonis, N., & Perfect, J. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021585 · Cited by 1,380
Clinical, Cellular, and Molecular Factors That Contribute to Antifungal Drug Resistance
White, T. C., Marr, K. A., & Bowden, R. A. (1998) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.11.2.382 · Cited by 1,353
Morrell, M., Fraser, V. J., & Kollef, M. H. (2005) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.49.9.3640-3645.2005 · Cited by 1,286
Garey, K. W., Rege, M., Pai, M. P., Mingo, D. E., Suda, K. J., Turpin, R. S., & Bearden, D. T. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/504810 · Cited by 1,171
Rex, J. H., Bennett, J. E., Sugar, A. M., Pappas, P. G., van der Horst, C. M., Edwards, J. E., Washburn, R. G., Scheld, W. M., Karchmer, A. W., Dine, A. P., et al. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199411173312001 · Cited by 1,039
Calderone, R. (2012) · ASM Press eBooks · Cited by 912
Antifungal drug resistance: mechanisms, epidemiology, and consequences for treatment
Pfaller, M. A. (2012) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.11.001 · Cited by 903
Self-citationEpidemiology of Invasive Mycoses in North America
Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/10408410903241444 · Cited by 901
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- PfallerMA DiekemaDJ. 2007. Azole antifungal drug cross-resistance: mechanisms, epidemiology, and clinical significance. J. Invasive Fungal Infect. 1:74–92.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Azole Antifungal Resistance in Candida albicans and Emerging Non-albicans Candida Species
Whaley, S. G., Berkow, E. L., Rybak, J. M., Nishimoto, A. T., Barker, K. S., & Rogers, P. D. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173 · Cited by 900
The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection
Mazuski, J. E., Tessier, J. M., May, A. K., Sawyer, R. G., Nadler, E. P., Rosengart, M. R., Chang, P. K., O’Neill, P. J., Mollen, K. P., Huston, J. M., et al. (2017) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2016.261 · Cited by 604
Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis
Lamoth, F., Lockhart, S. R., Berkow, E. L., & Calandra, T. (2018) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkx444 · Cited by 547
Emerging Threats in Antifungal-Resistant Fungal Pathogens
Sanglard, D. (2016) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2016.00011 · Cited by 435
Multidrug-resistant endemic clonal strain of Candida auris in India
Chowdhary, A., Anil Kumar, V., Sharma, C., Prakash, A., Agarwal, K., Babu, R., Dinesh, K. R., Karim, S., Singh, S. K., Hagen, F., et al. (2014) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/s10096-013-2027-1 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2846-2856
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- PMC
- PMC3421803
- OpenAlex
- W2120299440
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Eisai
- Astellas Pharma
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Keywords
- Candida, antifungal susceptibility testing, broth microdilution, epidemiological cut-off values, clinical breakpoints, fluconazole, voriconazole, echinocandins, antifungal resistance, Candida species, CLSI guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
