The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel in Identification of Bacteria and Yeasts from Positive Blood Culture Bottles
Open accessAbstract
The FilmArray platform (FA; BioFire, Salt Lake City, UT) is a closed diagnostic system allowing high-order multiplex PCR analysis with automated readout of results directly from positive blood cultures in 1 h. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical performance of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel, which includes 19 bacteria, five yeasts, and three antibiotic resistance genes. In total, 206 blood culture bottles were included in the study. The FilmArray could identify microorganisms in 153/167 (91.6%) samples with monomicrobial growth. Thirteen of the 167 (7.8%) microorganisms were not covered by the FilmArray BCID panel. In 6/167 (3.6%) samples, the FilmArray detected an additional microorganism compared to blood culture. When polymicrobial growth was analyzed, the FilmArray could detect all target microorganisms in 17/24 (71%) samples. Twelve blood culture bottles that yielded a positive signal but showed no growth were also negative by FilmArray. In 3/206 (1.5%) bottles, the FilmArray results were invalid. The results of the FilmArray were reproducible, as demonstrated by the testing and retesting of five bottles in the same day and a longitudinal follow-up of five other blood cultures up to 4 weeks. The present study shows that the FilmArray is a rapid identification method with high performance in direct identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Angus, D. C., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., Lidicker, J., Clermont, G., Carcillo, J., & Pinsky, M. R. (2001) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002 · Cited by 8,503
Seng, P., Drancourt, M., Gouriet, F., La Scola, B., Fournier, P., Rolain, J. M., & Raoult, D. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/600885 · Cited by 1,983
Goto, M., & Al-Hasan, M. N. (2013) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12195 · Cited by 752
The benefit of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infection
Leibovici, Shraga, Drucker, Konigsberger, Samra, Pitlik, & Pitlik (1998) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.1998.00379.x · Cited by 685
Poritz, M. A., Blaschke, A. J., Byington, C. L., Allen, L., Nilsson, K., Jones, D. E., Thatcher, S. A., Robbins, T., Lingenfelter, B., Amiott, E., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026047 · Cited by 429
Stevenson, L. G., Drake, S. K., & Murray, P. R. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01541-09 · Cited by 424
La Scola, B., & Raoult, D. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008041 · Cited by 383
Christner, M., Rohde, H., Wolters, M., Sobottka, I., Wegscheider, K., & Aepfelbacher, M. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01831-09 · Cited by 303
Ferroni, A., Suarez, S., Beretti, J.-L., Dauphin, B., Bille, E., Meyer, J., Bougnoux, M.-E., Alanio, A., Berche, P., & Nassif, X. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02485-09 · Cited by 283
Prod'hom, G., Bizzini, A., Durussel, C., Bille, J., & Greub, G. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01780-09 · Cited by 266
Cited by
Shane, A. L., Mody, R. K., Crump, J. A., Tarr, P. I., Steiner, T. S., Kotloff, K., Langley, J. M., Wanke, C., Warren, C. A., Cheng, A. C., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix669 · Cited by 627
Banerjee, R., Teng, C. B., Cunningham, S. A., Ihde, S. M., Steckelberg, J. M., Moriarty, J. P., Shah, N. D., Mandrekar, J. N., & Patel, R. (2015) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ447 · Cited by 570
Shane, A. L., Mody, R. K., Crump, J. A., Tarr, P. I., Steiner, T. S., Kotloff, K., Langley, J. M., Wanke, C., Warren, C. A., Cheng, A. C., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix959 · Cited by 532
Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement
Timsit, J.-F., Ruppé, E., Barbier, F., Tabah, A., & Bassetti, M. (2020) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-020-05950-6 · Cited by 448
Syndromic Panel-Based Testing in Clinical Microbiology
Ramanan, P., Bryson, A. L., Binnicker, M. J., Pritt, B. S., & Patel, R. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00024-17 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Altun, O., Almuhayawi, M., Ullberg, M., & Özenci, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4130-4136
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2157579931
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel in Identification of Bacteria and Yeasts from Positive Blood Culture Bottles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.01835-13
- The paper
- Altun, O., Almuhayawi, M., Ullberg, M., & Özenci, V. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel in Identification of Bacteria and Yeasts from Positive Blood Culture Bottles. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01835-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
