Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Increased Sporulation Rate of Epidemic Clostridium difficile Type 027/NAP1

Open access
Åkerlund, Thomas, Persson, Ingela, Unemo, Magnus, Norén, Torbjörn, Svenungsson, Bo, Wullt, Marlene, Burman, Lars G.·2008·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 comprised 0.2% of a collection of Swedish isolates in 1997-2001 (3 of 1,325 isolates). These isolates had lower moxifloxacin MICs than the epidemic type 027 isolates, but they had the same tcdC sequence and toxin yield. Type 027 produced 3- to 13-fold more toxin than did major Swedish types. One epidemic strain (027/NAP1a) sporulated more than did other type 027 isolates, a feature that should contribute to its survival and spread.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.01964-07

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Åkerlund, T., Persson, I., Unemo, M., Norén, T., Svenungsson, B., Wullt, M., & Burman, L. G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2008-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
1530-1533
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2141951202
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
14.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Sporulation Rate of Epidemic Clostridium difficile Type 027/NAP1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.01964-07
The paper
Åkerlund, T., Persson, I., Unemo, M., Norén, T., Svenungsson, B., Wullt, M., & Burman, L. G. (2008). Increased Sporulation Rate of Epidemic Clostridium difficile Type 027/NAP1. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01964-07

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.