Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contribution of the (1→3)-β- d -Glucan Assay for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections

Open access
Persat, Florence, Ranque, Stéphane, Derouin, Francis, Michel-Nguyen, Annie, Picot, Stéphane, Sulahian, Annie·2008·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Diagnosis of invasive fungal infection (IFI) remains a challenge. A retrospective study was performed on 279 patients at three French university hospitals to evaluate the performance of the (1→3)-β- d -glucan assay (BG assay; Fungitell; Associates of Cape Cod, Inc.) for the diagnosis of IFI. The results of one serum per subject were analyzed for 117 patients who had probable or proven IFI according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria (70 invasive pulmonary aspergilloses [IPA], 27 fungal bloodstream infections, and 20 Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonias), 40 blood donors, and 122 patients who were hospitalized in hematology wards or intensive care units and were at risk for IFI but in whom IFI had not been diagnosed. For the overall IFI diagnosis, the BG assay had 77.8% sensitivity and specificities of 92.5 and 70.5% for blood donors and patients at risk, respectively. The assay was positive in 48 patients with IPA (68%), in 23 with bloodstream infections (85.2%), and in all who had P. jiroveci pneumonias (100%), and the false-positive rate varied depending on the controls used. It allowed a higher rate of detection among IPA patients compared to the galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (48 versus 39 patients, respectively) and among candidemia patients compared to the mannan ELISA (20 versus 11 patients, respectively). This assay therefore appears to be useful in the diagnosis of IFI, particularly for serum analysis of pneumocystosis pneumonia patients, but further studies are needed to evaluate false-positive rates and its future role in IFI diagnosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.02091-07

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Persat, F., Ranque, S., Derouin, F., Michel-Nguyen, A., Picot, S., & Sulahian, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2008-03
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
1009-1013
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W1990185585
Cited by
173
References
4
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of the (1→3)-β- d -Glucan Assay for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.02091-07
The paper
Persat, F., Ranque, S., Derouin, F., Michel-Nguyen, A., Picot, S., & Sulahian, A. (2008). Contribution of the (1→3)-β- d -Glucan Assay for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02091-07

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.