The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Open accessAbstract
Over a 2-year period (2003 to 2005) patients with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) and community-acquired methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MSSA) infections were prospectively identified. Patients infected with CA-MRSA ( n = 102 patients) and CA-MSSA ( n = 102 patients) had median ages of 46 and 53 years, respectively; the most common sites of infection in the two groups were skin/soft tissue (80 and 93%, respectively), respiratory tract (13 and 6%, respectively), and blood (4 and 1%, respectively). Fourteen percent of patients with CA-MRSA infections and 3% of patients with CA-MSSA infections had household contacts with similar infections ( P < 0.01). Among the CA-MRSA isolates, the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) groups detected were USA300 (49%) and USA100 (13%), with 27 PFGE groups overall; 71% of the isolates were staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCC mec ) type IV, 29% were SCC mec type II, and 54% had the Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) gene. Among the CA-MSSA isolates there were 33 PFGE groups, with isolates of the USA200 group comprising 11%, isolates of the USA600 group comprising 11%, isolates of the USA100 group comprising 10%, and isolates of the PVL type comprising 10%. Forty-six and 18% of the patients infected with CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA, respectively, were hospitalized ( P < 0.001). Fifty percent of the patients received antibiotic therapy alone, 5% received surgery alone, 30% received antibiotics and surgery, 3% received other therapy, and 12% received no treatment. The median durations of antibiotic therapy were 12 and 10 days in the CA-MRSA- and CA-MSSA-infected patients, respectively; 48 and 56% of the patients in the two groups received adequate antimicrobial therapy, respectively ( P < 0.001). The clinical success rates of the initial therapy in the two groups were 61 and 84%, respectively ( P < 0.001); recurrences were more common in the CA-MRSA group (recurrences were detected in 18 and 6% of the patients in the two groups, respectively [ P < 0.001]). CA-MRSA was an independent predictor of clinical failure in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 6.9). In the community setting, the molecular characteristics of the S. aureus strains were heterogeneous. CA-MRSA infections were associated with a more adverse impact on outcome than CA-MSSA infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Infections among Patients in the Emergency Department
Moran, G. J., Krishnadasan, A., Gorwitz, R. J., Fosheim, G. E., McDougal, L. K., Carey, R. B., & Talan, D. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055356 · Cited by 2,285
Gillet, Y., Issartel, B., Vanhems, P., Fournet, J.-C., Lina, G., Bes, M., Vandenesch, F., Piémont, Y., Brousse, N., Floret, D., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07877-7 · Cited by 1,514
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Disease in Three Communities
Fridkin, S. K., Hageman, J. C., Morrison, M., Sanza, L. T., Como-Sabetti, K., Jernigan, J. A., Harriman, K., Harrison, L. H., Lynfield, R., & Farley, M. M. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043252 · Cited by 1,493
Miller, L. G., Perdreau-Remington, F., Rieg, G., Mehdi, S., Perlroth, J., Bayer, A. S., Tang, A. W., Phung, T. O., & Spellberg, B. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042683 · Cited by 1,053
Cited by
Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L., & Fowler, V. G. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00134-14 · Cited by 5,192
Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era
Chambers, H. F., & DeLeo, F. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2200 · Cited by 2,718
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology
Lakhundi, S., & Zhang, K. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00020-18 · Cited by 1,637
Bell, B. G., Schellevis, F., Stobberingh, E., Goossens, H., & Pringle, M. (2014) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-13 · Cited by 1,262
Reemergence of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the genomics era
DeLeo, F. R., & Chambers, H. F. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci38226 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, S. L., Perri, M. B., Donabedian, S. M., Manierski, C., Singh, A., Vager, D., Haque, N. Z., Speirs, K., Muder, R. R., Robinson-Dunn, B., Hayden, M. K., & Zervos, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1705-1711
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2122267759
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.02311-06
- The paper
- Davis, S. L., Perri, M. B., Donabedian, S. M., Manierski, C., Singh, A., Vager, D., Haque, N. Z., Speirs, K., Muder, R. R., Robinson-Dunn, B., Hayden, M. K., & Zervos, M. J. (2007). Epidemiology and Outcomes of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02311-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.