Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Laboratory-Developed TaqMan Array Card for Simultaneous Detection of 19 Enteropathogens

Open access
Liu, Jie, Gratz, Jean, Amour, Caroline, Kibiki, Gibson, Becker, Stephen, Janaki, Lalitha, Verweij, Jaco J., Taniuchi, Mami, Sobuz, Shihab U., Haque, Rashidul, Haverstick, Doris M., Houpt, Eric R.·2013·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

The TaqMan Array Card (TAC) system is a 384-well singleplex real-time PCR format that has been used to detect multiple infection targets. Here we developed an enteric TaqMan Array Card to detect 19 enteropathogens, including viruses (adenovirus, astrovirus, norovirus GII, rotavirus, and sapovirus), bacteria ( Campylobacter jejuni/C. coli , Clostridium difficile , Salmonella , Vibrio cholerae , diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains including enteroaggregative E. coli [EAEC], enterotoxigenic E. coli [ETEC], enteropathogenic E. coli [EPEC], and Shiga-toxigenic E. coli [STEC]), Shigella /enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), protozoa ( Cryptosporidium , Giardia lamblia , and Entamoeba histolytica ), and helminths ( Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura ), as well as two extrinsic controls to monitor extraction and amplification efficiency (the bacteriophage MS2 and phocine herpesvirus). Primers and probes were newly designed or adapted from published sources and spotted onto microfluidic cards. Fecal samples were spiked with extrinsic controls, and DNA and RNA were extracted using the QiaAmp Stool DNA minikit and the QuickGene RNA Tissue kit, respectively, and then mixed with Ag-Path-ID One Step real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) reagents and loaded into cards. PCR efficiencies were between 90% and 105%, with linearities of 0.988 to 1. The limit of detection of the assays in the TAC was within a 10-fold difference from the cognate assays performed on plates. Precision testing demonstrated a coefficient of variation of below 5% within a run and 14% between runs. Accuracy was evaluated for 109 selected clinical specimens and revealed an average sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 77%, respectively, compared with conventional methods (including microscopy, culture, and immunoassay) and 98% and 96%, respectively, compared with our laboratory-developed PCR-Luminex assays. This TAC allows fast, accurate, and quantitative detection of a broad spectrum of enteropathogens and is well suited for surveillance or clinical purposes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.02658-12

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Gratz, J., Amour, C., Kibiki, G., Becker, S., Janaki, L., Verweij, J. J., Taniuchi, M., Sobuz, S. U., Haque, R., Haverstick, D. M., & Houpt, E. R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2013-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
472-480
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2142662767
Cited by
393
References
0
FWCI
14.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Laboratory-Developed TaqMan Array Card for Simultaneous Detection of 19 Enteropathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.02658-12
The paper
Liu, J., Gratz, J., Amour, C., Kibiki, G., Becker, S., Janaki, L., Verweij, J. J., Taniuchi, M., Sobuz, S. U., Haque, R., Haverstick, D. M., & Houpt, E. R. (2013). A Laboratory-Developed TaqMan Array Card for Simultaneous Detection of 19 Enteropathogens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02658-12

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.