Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 671

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence of Uncultivated Bacteria in the Adult Female Bladder

Open access
Wolfe, Alan J., Toh, Evelyn, Shibata, Noriko, Rong, Ruichen, Kenton, Kimberly, FitzGerald, MaryPat, Mueller, Elizabeth R., Schreckenberger, Paul, Dong, Qunfeng, Nelson, David E., Brubaker, Linda·2012·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Clinical urine specimens are usually considered to be sterile when they do not yield uropathogens using standard clinical cultivation procedures. Our aim was to test if the adult female bladder might contain bacteria that are not identified by these routine procedures. An additional aim was to identify and recommend the appropriate urine collection method for the study of bacterial communities in the female bladder. Consenting participants who were free of known urinary tract infection provided urine samples by voided, transurethral, and/or suprapubic collection methods. The presence of bacteria in these samples was assessed by bacterial culture, light microscopy, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Bacteria that are not or cannot be routinely cultivated (hereinafter called uncultivated bacteria) were common in voided urine, urine collected by transurethral catheter (TUC), and urine collected by suprapubic aspirate (SPA), regardless of whether the subjects had urinary symptoms. Voided urine samples contained mixtures of urinary and genital tract bacteria. Communities identified in parallel urine samples collected by TUC and SPA were similar. Uncultivated bacteria are clearly present in the bladders of some women. It remains unclear if these bacteria are viable and/or if their presence is relevant to idiopathic urinary tract conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.05852-11

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 671

Metadata

Authors
Wolfe, A. J., Toh, E., Shibata, N., Rong, R., Kenton, K., FitzGerald, M., Mueller, E. R., Schreckenberger, P., Dong, Q., Nelson, D. E., & Brubaker, L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2012-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
1376-1383
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W1967961996
Cited by
671
References
6
FWCI
14.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence of Uncultivated Bacteria in the Adult Female Bladder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.05852-11
The paper
Wolfe, A. J., Toh, E., Shibata, N., Rong, R., Kenton, K., FitzGerald, M., Mueller, E. R., Schreckenberger, P., Dong, Q., Nelson, D. E., & Brubaker, L. (2012). Evidence of Uncultivated Bacteria in the Adult Female Bladder. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.05852-11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.