The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiological marker for study of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we have compared genomic DNA fingerprintings among isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Chromosomal fragments digested with SmaI were most suitable for the PFGE separation. SmaI cut genomic DNA into 15 to 20 fragments whose sizes ranged from about 30 to 1,500 kb. Thirty-one distinctive fragment patterns were identified in 111 infecting and colonizing MRSA isolates from six different hospitals in Japan. On the basis of the genomic typing by PFGE, we performed an epidemiological investigation of an outbreak of nosocomial MRSA infections among inpatients in Nagoya University Hospital. Ten types of chromosomal digestion were identified in the 20 strains isolated from 18 infected patients and 1 from colonized hospital personnel. According to the restriction patterns, we found that four types of these strains had caused epidemic infections among 13 patients in the outbreak. Two types (types 1 and 4) of the strains were involved in the death of five patients. The other infections were sporadic. The clarity and polymorphism of the chromosomal digestion patterns enabled us to discriminate between isolates which could not be differentiated by antibiogram or plasmid analysis. Classification of the genomic DNA fingerprinting patterns by PFGE is therefore proposed as a useful method for investigating the source, transmission, and spread of nosocomial MRSA infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Cited by
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology
Lakhundi, S., & Zhang, K. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00020-18 · Cited by 1,637
Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus on the basis of coagulase gene polymorphisms
Goh, S. H., Byrne, S. K., Zhang, J. L., & Chow, A. W. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.30.7.1642-1645.1992 · Cited by 306
Senda, K., Arakawa, Y., Nakashima, K., Ito, H., Ichiyama, S., Shimokata, K., Kato, N., & Ohta, M. (1996) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.40.2.349 · Cited by 275
Self-citationChromosome‐Determined Zinc‐Responsible Operon czr in Staphylococcus aureus Strain 912
Kuroda, M., Hayashi, H., & Ohta, T. (1999) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.1999.tb02382.x · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Ichiyama, S., Ohta, M., Shimokata, K., Kato, N., & Takeuchi, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2690-2695
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1892225771
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiological marker for study of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.29.12.2690-2695.1991
- The paper
- Ichiyama, S., Ohta, M., Shimokata, K., Kato, N., & Takeuchi, J. (1991). Genomic DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiological marker for study of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.12.2690-2695.1991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.