The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis of early Lyme disease by polymerase chain reaction amplification and culture of skin biopsies from erythema migrans lesions
Open accessAbstract
Current laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease relies on tests for the detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiologic agent of the disease. These tests are often unreliable because of a lack of sensitivity and specificity and test-to-test variability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification for detection of B. burgdorferi in skin biopsy specimens. Forty-six 2-mm skin biopsy samples were obtained from 44 patients with a clinical diagnosis of erythema migrans, 9 of whom were receiving antibiotic therapy at the time of biopsy. Specimens were ground in BSK medium with separate aliquots taken for culture and PCR. Of the specimens from the untreated group, 57% (21 of 37) were positive by culture and 22% (8 of 37) were culture negative; 22% (8 of 37) of the cultures were uninformative because of contamination. By comparison, 22 (59%) of 37 specimens were positive by PCR amplification. Of 21 culture-positive samples, 13 (62%) were also positive by PCR analysis. Thus, the sensitivity of the PCR was 59 to 62%, based on either a clinical or cultural diagnosis of untreated Lyme disease. None of the nine specimens from antibiotic-treated patients grew in culture, whereas two of the nine were positive by PCR analysis. Given the complexity and time required for culture, PCR is a promising technique for the diagnosis of early Lyme disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aguero-Rosenfeld, M. E., Wang, G., Schwartz, I., & Wormser, G. P. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.18.3.484-509.2005 · Cited by 744
Self-citationPOSTIC, D., ASSOUS, M. V., GRIMONT, P. A. D., & BARANTON, G. (1994) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-44-4-743 · Cited by 499
Lyme borreliosis in Europe and North America
PIESMAN, J., & GERN, L. (2004) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182003004694 · Cited by 373
Coughlin, R. T., Fish, D., Mather, T. N., Ma, J., Pavia, C., & Bulger, P. (1995) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/171.4.1049 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, I., Wormser, G. P., Schwartz, J. J., Cooper, D., Weissensee, P., Gazumyan, A., Zimmermann, E., Goldberg, N. S., Bittker, S., & Campbell, G. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3082-3088
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1841638115
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of early Lyme disease by polymerase chain reaction amplification and culture of skin biopsies from erythema migrans lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.30.12.3082-3088.1992
- The paper
- Schwartz, I., Wormser, G. P., Schwartz, J. J., Cooper, D., Weissensee, P., Gazumyan, A., Zimmermann, E., Goldberg, N. S., Bittker, S., & Campbell, G. L. (1992). Diagnosis of early Lyme disease by polymerase chain reaction amplification and culture of skin biopsies from erythema migrans lesions. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.12.3082-3088.1992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.