The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients
Open accessAbstract
Rapid diagnosis of respiratory viral infections in children resulted in significantly reduced hospital stays, antibiotic use, and laboratory utilization compared with those of a matched group of patients from the previous year who were diagnosed by virus culture. We demonstrate that rapid diagnosis of respiratory infections in children is a cost-effective procedure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multiplex PCR: Optimization and Application in Diagnostic Virology
Elnifro, E. M., Ashshi, A. M., Cooper, R. J., & Klapper, P. E. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.4.559-570.2000 · Cited by 964
Hanson, K. E., & Couturier, M. R. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw494 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Woo, P. C., Chiu, S. S., Seto, W. H., & Peiris, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1579-1581
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2163911337
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.35.6.1579-1581.1997
- The paper
- Woo, P. C., Chiu, S. S., Seto, W. H., & Peiris, M. (1997). Cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.6.1579-1581.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
