Cited by 99Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingBiosensors and Analytical DetectionClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Multiplexed Molecular Diagnostics for Respiratory, Gastrointestinal, and Central Nervous System Infections

Open access
Hanson, Kimberly E., Couturier, Marc Roger·2016·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The development and implementation of highly multiplexed molecular diagnostic tests have allowed clinical microbiology laboratories to more rapidly and sensitively detect a variety of pathogens directly in clinical specimens. Current US Food and Drug Administration-approved multiplex panels target multiple different organisms simultaneously and can identify the most common pathogens implicated in respiratory viral, gastrointestinal, or central nervous system infections. This review summarizes the test characteristics of available assays, highlights the advantages and limitations of multiplex technology for infectious diseases, and discusses potential utilization of these new tests in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciw494

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanson, K. E., & Couturier, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Hanson, Kimberly E.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
63
Issue
10
Pages
1361-1367
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2504315498
Cited by
99
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • BioFire Dignostics, LLC (5R43AI104029-02, 5R01AI11703502)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
pathogen detection, respiratory viral infections, gastrointestinal infections, central nervous system infection, multiplex PCR panels, clinical microbiology laboratory, rapid pathogen detection
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Central Nervous System Infections, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Respiratory Tract Infections, Virus Diseases, Viruses, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review