Cited by 35Yeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityUrinary Tract Infections Management

Chronic Urinary Tract Infection Due to Candida utilis

Open access
Hazen, Kevin C., Theisz, Gordon W., Howell, Susan A.·1999·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

An elderly male was seen at an outpatient urology clinic over a period of 3 years with repeat urine specimens containing 10 4 to 10 5 CFU of a “ Candida species, not C. albicans .” The urine specimens were described as infected due to the presence of pyuria, but no antifungal therapy was administered. On two occasions, the patient presented to the emergency room and urine specimens were sent to the clinical microbiology laboratory. On both occasions, a yeast was isolated at concentrations of >10 5 CFU/ml. The organism was identified as the anamorphic yeast Candida utilis (teleomorph: Pichia jadinii ) by conventional methods. Molecular methods, including karyotyping and restriction enzyme analysis, confirmed that the isolates were identical and were C. utilis . The patient developed benign prostatic hypertrophy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during the 3-year course. This report is the first demonstration of the isolation of the industrially important yeast C. utilis from a urinary tract infection. In the present case, the organism was associated with chronic, symptomatic disease. The significance of this unusual, low-virulence isolate from a case of urinary tract infection is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.37.3.824-827.1999

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hazen, K. C., Theisz, G. W., & Howell, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1999-03
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
824-827
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2128372104
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
Keywords
Candida utilis, urinary tract infection, chronic infection, anamorphic yeast, pyuria, elderly man, karyology, restriction enzyme analysis, molecular identification
MeSH terms
Aged, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Chronic Disease, Humans, Instillation, Drug, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Male, Neomycin, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Recurrence, Urinary Tract Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review