The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contemporary Assessment of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Polymyxin B and Colistin: Review of Available Interpretative Criteria and Quality Control Guidelines
Open accessAbstract
The emergence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. has necessitated the search for alternative parenteral agents such as the polymyxins. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) documents do not currently provide interpretative criteria for the testing of the polymyxins, colistin and polymyxin B. Therefore, an evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of colistin and polymyxin B was initiated using 200 bloodstream infection pathogens collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. All susceptibility tests were performed according to the NCCLS recommendations. Polymyxin B and colistin displayed a nearly identical spectrum of activity, exhibiting excellent potency against P. aeruginosa (MIC 90 , 2 μg/ml) and Acinetobacter sp. (MIC 90 , 2 μg/ml). In contrast, they showed limited activity against some other nonfermentative bacilli such as Burkholderia cepacia (MIC 90 , ≥128 μg/ml). Excellent correlation was achieved between broth microdilution and agar dilution tests ( r = 0.96 to 0.98); 94.3% of the results were ±1 log 2 dilution between the methods used for both compounds. At a resistance breakpoint of ≥4 μg/ml for both agents, unacceptable false-susceptible or very major errors were noted for colistin (5%) and polymyxin B (6%). Modified zone criteria for colistin (≤11 and ≥14 mm) and polymyxin B (≤10 and ≥14 mm) were suggested, but some degree of error persisted (≥3.5%). It is recommended that all susceptible disk diffusion results be confirmed by MIC tests using the preferred reference NCCLS method. The quality control (QC) ranges listed in the product package insert require an adjusted range by approximately 3 mm for both NCCLS gram-negative quality control strains. This evaluation of in vitro susceptibility test methods for the polymyxin class drugs confirmed continued serious testing error with the disk diffusion method, the possible need for breakpoint adjustments, and the recalculation of disk diffusion QC ranges. Clinical laboratories should exclusively use MIC methods to assist the therapeutic application of colistin or polymyxin B until disk diffusion test modifications are sanctioned and published by the NCCLS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chang, Y.-T., Lin, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., & Hsueh, P.-R. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00893 · Cited by 419
Hota, S., Hirji, Z., Stockton, K., Lemieux, C., Dedier, H., Wolfaardt, G., & Gardam, M. A. (2009) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/592700 · Cited by 355
Lo-Ten-Foe, J. R., de Smet, A. M. G. A., Diederen, B. M. W., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., & van Keulen, P. H. J. (2007) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01406-06 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Gales, A. C., Reis, A. O., & Jones, R. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-190
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2027813901
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Assessment of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Polymyxin B and Colistin: Review of Available Interpretative Criteria and Quality Control Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.39.1.183-190.2001
- The paper
- Gales, A. C., Reis, A. O., & Jones, R. N. (2001). Contemporary Assessment of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Polymyxin B and Colistin: Review of Available Interpretative Criteria and Quality Control Guidelines. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.1.183-190.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.