The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Throughput Detection of West Nile Virus RNA
Open accessAbstract
The recent outbreaks of West Nile virus (WNV) in the northeastern United States and other regions of the world have made it essential to develop an efficient protocol for surveillance of WNV. In the present report, we describe a high-throughput procedure that combines automated RNA extraction, amplification, and detection of WNV RNA. The procedure analyzed 96 samples in approximately 4.5 h. A robotic system, the ABI Prism 6700 Automated Nucleic Acid workstation, extracted RNA and set up reactions for real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR in a 96-well format. The robot extracted RNA with a recovery as efficient as that of a commercial RNA extraction kit. A real-time RT-PCR assay was used to detect and quantitate WNV RNA. Using in vitro transcribed RNA, we estimated the detection limit of the real-time RT-PCR to be approximately 40 copies of RNA. A standard RT-PCR assay was optimized to a sensitivity similar to that of the real-time RT-PCR. The standard assay can be reliably used to test a small number of samples or to confirm previous test results. Using internal primers in a nested RT-PCR, we increased the sensitivity by approximately 10-fold compared to that of the standard RT-PCR. The results of the study demonstrated for the first time that the use of an automated system for the purpose of large-scale viral RNA surveillance dramatically increased the speed and efficiency of sample throughput for diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lanciotti, R. S., Roehrig, J. T., Deubel, V., Smith, J., Parker, M., Steele, K., Crise, B., Volpe, K. E., Crabtree, M. B., Scherret, J. H., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5448.2333 · Cited by 1,593
Lanciotti, R. S., Kerst, A. J., Nasci, R. S., Godsey, M. S., Mitchell, C. J., Savage, H. M., Komar, N., Panella, N. A., Allen, B. C., Volpe, K. E., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.11.4066-4071.2000 · Cited by 1,087
Cited by
Parida, M., Posadas, G., Inoue, S., Hasebe, F., & Morita, K. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.1.257-263.2004 · Cited by 438
Structure and Function of Flavivirus NS5 Methyltransferase
Zhou, Y., Ray, D., Zhao, Y., Dong, H., Ren, S., Li, Z., Guo, Y., Bernard, K. A., Shi, P.-Y., & Li, H. (2007) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02704-06 · Cited by 406
Self-citationRay, D., Shah, A., Tilgner, M., Guo, Y., Zhao, Y., Dong, H., Deas, T. S., Zhou, Y., Li, H., & Shi, P.-Y. (2006) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00814-06 · Cited by 386
Self-citationLanciotti, R. S., & Kerst, A. J. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.39.12.4506-4513.2001 · Cited by 267
Reisen, W., Lothrop, H., Chiles, R., Madon, M., Cossen, C., Woods, L., Husted, S., Kramer, V., & Edman, J. (2004) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1008.040077 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, P.-Y., Kauffman, E. B., Ren, P., Felton, A., Tai, J. H., Dupuis, A. P., Jones, S. A., Ngo, K. A., Nicholas, D. C., Maffei, J., Ebel, G. D., Bernard, K. A., & Kramer, L. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1264-1271
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2081988931
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Throughput Detection of West Nile Virus RNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.39.4.1264-1271.2001
- The paper
- Shi, P.-Y., Kauffman, E. B., Ren, P., Felton, A., Tai, J. H., Dupuis, A. P., Jones, S. A., Ngo, K. A., Nicholas, D. C., Maffei, J., Ebel, G. D., Bernard, K. A., & Kramer, L. D. (2001). High-Throughput Detection of West Nile Virus RNA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.4.1264-1271.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.