The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classification and Identification of Enterococci: a Comparative Phenotypic, Genotypic, and Vibrational Spectroscopic Study
Open accessAbstract
Rapid and accurate identification of enterococci at the species level is an essential task in clinical microbiology since these organisms have emerged as one of the leading causes of nosocomial infections worldwide. Vibrational spectroscopic techniques (infrared [IR] and Raman) could provide potential alternatives to conventional typing methods, because they are fast, easy to perform, and economical. We present a comparative study using phenotypic, genotypic, and vibrational spectroscopic techniques for typing a collection of 18 Enterococcus strains comprising six different species. Classification of the bacteria by Fourier transform (FT)-IR spectroscopy in combination with hierarchical cluster analysis revealed discrepancies for certain strains when compared with results obtained from automated phenotypic systems, such as API and MicroScan. Further diagnostic evaluation using genotypic methods—i.e., PCR of the species-specific ligase and glycopeptide resistance genes, which is limited to the identification of only four Enterococcus species and 16S RNA sequencing, the “gold standard” for identification of enterococci—confirmed the results obtained by the FT-IR classification. These results were later reproduced by three different laboratories, using confocal Raman microspectroscopy, FT-IR attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy, and FT-IR microspectroscopy, demonstrating the discriminative capacity and the reproducibility of the technique. It is concluded that vibrational spectroscopic techniques have great potential as routine methods in clinical microbiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Characterization of the Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) of Bacteria
Premasiri, W. R., Moir, D. T., Klempner, M. S., Krieger, N., Jones, G., & Ziegler, L. D. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp040442n · Cited by 489
Raman Microscopic Analysis of Single Microbial Cells
Huang, W. E., Griffiths, R. I., Thompson, I. P., Bailey, M. J., & Whiteley, A. S. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac049753k · Cited by 411
Naser, S. M., Thompson, F. L., Hoste, B., Gevers, D., Dawyndt, P., Vancanneyt, M., & Swings, J. (2005) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.27840-0 · Cited by 409
Barcoding bacterial cells: a SERS‐based methodology for pathogen identification
Patel, I. S., Premasiri, W. R., Moir, D. T., & Ziegler, L. D. (2008) · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy · doi:10.1002/jrs.2064 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirschner, C., Maquelin, K., Pina, P., Ngo Thi, N. A., Choo-Smith, L.-P., Sockalingum, G. D., Sandt, C., Ami, D., Orsini, F., Doglia, S. M., Allouch, P., Mainfait, M., Puppels, G. J., & Naumann, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1763-1770
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2162392759
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification and Identification of Enterococci: a Comparative Phenotypic, Genotypic, and Vibrational Spectroscopic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.39.5.1763-1770.2001
- The paper
- Kirschner, C., Maquelin, K., Pina, P., Ngo Thi, N. A., Choo-Smith, L.-P., Sockalingum, G. D., Sandt, C., Ami, D., Orsini, F., Doglia, S. M., Allouch, P., Mainfait, M., Puppels, G. J., & Naumann, D. (2001). Classification and Identification of Enterococci: a Comparative Phenotypic, Genotypic, and Vibrational Spectroscopic Study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.5.1763-1770.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.