The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of Plasmid-Mediated AmpC β-Lactamase Genes in Clinical Isolates by Using Multiplex PCR
Open accessAbstract
Therapeutic options for infections caused by gram-negative organisms expressing plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases are limited because these organisms are usually resistant to all the β-lactam antibiotics, except for cefepime, cefpirome, and the carbapenems. These organisms are a major concern in nosocomial infections and should therefore be monitored in surveillance studies. Six families of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases have been identified, but no phenotypic test can differentiate among them, a fact which creates problems for surveillance and epidemiology studies. This report describes the development of a multiplex PCR for the purpose of identifying family-specific AmpC β-lactamase genes within gram-negative pathogens. The PCR uses six sets of ampC-specific primers resulting in amplicons that range from 190 bp to 520 bp and that are easily distinguished by gel electrophoresis.ampC multiplex PCR differentiated the six plasmid-mediated ampC-specific families in organisms such as Klebsiella pneumoniae,Escherichia coli,Proteus mirabilis, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Family-specific primers did not amplify genes from the other families of ampC genes. Furthermore, this PCR-based assay differentiated multiple genes within one reaction. In addition, WAVE technology, a high-pressure liquid chromatography-based separation system, was used as a way of decreasing analysis time and increasing the sensitivity of multiple-gene assays. In conclusion, a multiplex PCR technique was developed for identifying family-specific ampC genes responsible for AmpC β-lactamase expression in organisms with or without a chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase gene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dallenne, C., Da Costa, A., Decré, D., Favier, C., & Arlet, G. (2010) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkp498 · Cited by 1,655
A Primer on AmpC β-Lactamases: Necessary Knowledge for an Increasingly Multidrug-resistant World
Tamma, P. D., Doi, Y., Bonomo, R. A., Johnson, J. K., Simner, P. J., Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group, Tamma, P. D., Doi, Y., & Bonomo, R. A. (2019) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciz173 · Cited by 322
Grönthal, T., Österblad, M., Eklund, M., Jalava, J., Nykäsenoja, S., Pekkanen, K., & Rantala, M. (2018) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2018.23.27.1700497 · Cited by 170
Wedley, A. L., Dawson, S., Maddox, T. W., Coyne, K. P., Pinchbeck, G. L., Clegg, P., Nuttall, T., Kirchner, M., & Williams, N. J. (2017) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.11.017 · Cited by 91
Schmidt, V. M., Pinchbeck, G. L., Nuttall, T., McEwan, N., Dawson, S., & Williams, N. J. (2015) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.013 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Pérez-Pérez, F. J., & Hanson, N. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2153-2162
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2099001508
- Cited by
- 1,512
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Plasmid-Mediated AmpC β-Lactamase Genes in Clinical Isolates by Using Multiplex PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.40.6.2153-2162.2002
- The paper
- Pérez-Pérez, F. J., & Hanson, N. D. (2002). Detection of Plasmid-Mediated AmpC β-Lactamase Genes in Clinical Isolates by Using Multiplex PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.40.6.2153-2162.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.