The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of Salmonella enterica Serotype Newport Isolated from Humans and Food Animals
Open accessAbstract
Salmonella enterica serotype Newport isolates resistant to at least nine antimicrobials (including extended-spectrum cephalosporins), known as serotype Newport MDR-AmpC isolates, have been rapidly emerging as pathogens in both animals and humans throughout the United States. Resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins is associated with clinical failures, including death, in patients with systemic infections. In this study, 87 Salmonella serotype Newport strains were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing and examined for the presence of class 1 integrons and blaCMY genes. Thirty-five PFGE patterns were observed with Xba I, and three of these patterns were indistinguishable among isolates from humans and animals. Fifty-three (60%)Salmonella serotype Newport isolates were identified as serotype Newport MDR-AmpC, including 16 (53%) of 30 human isolates, 27 (93%) of 29 cattle isolates, 7 (70%) of 10 swine isolates, and 3 (30%) of 10 chicken isolates. However, 28 (32%)Salmonella serotype Newport isolates were susceptible to all 16 antimicrobials tested. The blaCMY gene was present in all serotype Newport MDR-AmpC isolates. Furthermore, the plasmid-mediated blaCMY gene was transferable via conjugation to an Escherichia coli strain. The transconjugant showed the MDR-AmpC resistance profile. Thirty-five (40%) of the isolates possessed class 1 integrons. Sequence analyses of the integrons showed that they contained aadA, which confers resistance to streptomycin, or aadA and dhfr, which confer resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. One integron from a swine isolate contained the sat-1 gene, which encodes resistance to streptothricin, an antimicrobial agent that has never been approved for use in the United States. In conclusion,Salmonella serotype Newport MDR-AmpC was commonly identified among Salmonella serotype Newport isolates recovered from humans and food animals. These findings support the possibility of transmission of this organism to humans through the food chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health
Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-11 · Cited by 2,241
Crump, J. A., Sjölund-Karlsson, M., Gordon, M. A., & Parry, C. M. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-15 · Cited by 1,156
Mathew, A. G., Cissell, R., & Liamthong, S. (2007) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2006.0066 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, S., Qaiyumi, S., Friedman, S., Singh, R., Foley, S. L., White, D. G., McDermott, P. F., Donkar, T., Bolin, C., Munro, S., Baron, E. J., & Walker, R. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5366-5371
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2109044697
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Salmonella enterica Serotype Newport Isolated from Humans and Food Animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.41.12.5366-5371.2003
- The paper
- Zhao, S., Qaiyumi, S., Friedman, S., Singh, R., Foley, S. L., White, D. G., McDermott, P. F., Donkar, T., Bolin, C., Munro, S., Baron, E. J., & Walker, R. D. (2003). Characterization of Salmonella enterica Serotype Newport Isolated from Humans and Food Animals. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.12.5366-5371.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.