Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PCR-Based Assay for Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Other Pseudomonas Species Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Open access
Spilker, Theodore, Coenye, Tom, Vandamme, Peter, LiPuma, John J.·2004·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the major opportunistic bacterial pathogen in persons with cystic fibrosis (CF); pulmonary infection occurs in approximately 80% of adult CF patients. Much of CF patient management depends on accurate identification of P. aeruginosa from sputum culture. However, identification of this species may be problematic due to the marked phenotypic variability demonstrated by CF sputum isolates and the presence of other closely related species. To facilitate species identification, we used 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence data to design PCR assays intended to provide genus- or species-level identification. Both assays yielded DNA fragments of the predicted size. We tested 42 culture collection strains (including 14 P. aeruginosa strains and 28 strains representing 16 other closely related Pseudomonas species) and 43 strains that had been previously identified as belonging to 28 nonpseudomonal species also recovered from CF patient sputum. Based on these 85 strains, the specificity and sensitivity of both assays were 100%. To further assess the utility of the PCR assays, we tested 66 recent CF sputum isolates. The results indicated that preliminary phenotypic testing had misidentified several isolates. The 16S rDNA sequence was determined for 38 isolates, and in all cases it confirmed the results of the PCR assays. Thus, we have designed two PCR assays: one is specific for the genus Pseudomonas , while the other is specific for P. aeruginosa . Both assays show 100% sensitivity and specificity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.42.5.2074-2079.2004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 513

Metadata

Authors
Spilker, T., Coenye, T., Vandamme, P., & LiPuma, J. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2004-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
2074-2079
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2027368837
Cited by
513
References
1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PCR-Based Assay for Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Other Pseudomonas Species Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.42.5.2074-2079.2004
The paper
Spilker, T., Coenye, T., Vandamme, P., & LiPuma, J. J. (2004). PCR-Based Assay for Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Other Pseudomonas Species Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.5.2074-2079.2004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.