The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Immortalization and altered differentiation of human keratinocytes in vitro by the E6 and E7 open reading frames of human papillomavirus type 18
Abstract
The E6-E7 region of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 is selectively retained and expressed in cervical carcinoma cells. In cultured human keratinocytes, expression of the E6 and E7 open reading frames of human papillomavirus type 18, under the control of its homologous promoter, resulted in high-frequency immortalization. Furthermore, by using a system that allows for stratification of keratinocytes in vitro (raft system), we observed that the morphological differentiation of these E6-E7 immortalized cells was altered such that parabasal cells extended throughout most of the epithelium, with abnormal nuclei present in the upper regions. Examination of E6-E7-expressing cell lines in the raft system at a later passage revealed that complete loss of morphological differentiation had occurred. E7 alone was a much less effective immortalizing agent than E6 and E7 together and acted only minimally to alter morphological differentiation in vitro. No such activities were found for E6 alone. High-frequency transformation of human epithelial cells thus appears to require expression of both E6 and E7 gene products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“HPV-16 E6/E7-expressing cell lines were immortalized but were not tumourigenic in nude mice, although they could induce tumours after several passages or in cooperation with additional oncogenes such as ras or fos [79,90,91,92]”
From The Not-So-Good, the Bad and the Ugly: HPV E5, E6 and E7 Oncoproteins in the Orchestration of Carcinogenesis (2021) · cites this paper as [91]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The human papilloma virus-16 E7-oncoprotein is able to bind to the retinoblastoma gene product
Dyson, N., Howley, P. M., Münger, K., & Harlow, E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2537532 · Cited by 3,017
Human Epidermis Reconstructed by Culture: Is It “Normal”?
Asselineau, D., Bernard, B. A., Bailly, C., Darmon, M., & Pruniéras, M. (1986) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12284237 · Cited by 192
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [16]16. Durst, M., L. Gissmann, H. Ikenberg, and H. zur Hausen. 1983. A papillomavirus DNA from a cervical carcinoma and its prevalence in cancer biopsy samples from different geographic regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:3812–3815.
- [28]28. McCance, D. J., R. Kopan, E. Fuchs, and L. A. Laimins. 1988. Human papillomavirus type 16 alters human epithelial cell differentiation in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:7169– 7173.
- [39]39. Smotkin, D., and F. O. Wettstein. 1986. Transcription of human papillomavirus type 16 early genes in a cervical cancer and a cancer-derived cell line and identification of the E7 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:4680–4684.
Cited by
Basukala, O., & Banks, L. (2021) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v13101892 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudson, J. B., Bedell, M. A., McCance, D. J., & Laiminis, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chicago, Illinois.
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 519-526
- ISSN
- 0022-538X
- 1098-5514
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review