Characterization of the genome of feline foamy virus and its proteins shows distinct features different from those of primate spumaviruses
Open accessAbstract
The genome of the feline foamy virus (FeFV) isolate FUV was characterized by molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of subgenomic proviral DNA. The overall genetic organization of FeFV and protein sequence comparisons of different FeFV genes with their counterparts from other known foamy viruses confirm that FeFV is a complex foamy virus. However, significant differences exist when FeFV is compared with primate foamy viruses. The FeFV Gag protein is smaller than that of the primate spumaviruses, mainly due to additional MA/CA sequences characteristic of the primate viruses only. Gag protein sequence motifs of the NC domain of primate foamy viruses assumed to be involved in genome encapsidation are not conserved in FeFV. FeFV Gag and Pol proteins were detected with monospecific antisera directed against Gag and Pol domains of the human foamy virus and with antisera from naturally infected cats. Proteolytic processing of the FeFV Gag precursor was incomplete, whereas more efficient proteolytic cleavage of the pre125Pro-Pol protein was observed. The active center of the FeFV protease contains a Gln that replaces an invariant Gly residue at this position in other retroviral proteases. Functional studies on FeFV gene expression directed by the promoter of the long terminal repeat showed that FeFV gene expression was strongly activated by the Bell/Tas transactivator protein. The FeFV Bell/Tas transactivator is about one-third smaller than its counterpart of primate spumaviruses. This difference is also reflected by a limited sequence similarity and only a moderate conservation of structural motifs of the different foamy virus transactivators analyzed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The basal activity of both foamy virus promoters can be trans-activated by the Tas protein.
“The basal activity of both promoters can be trans-activated by the Tas (trans-activator of spumavirus) protein (Baunach et al. 1993, Winkler et al. 1997, Omoto et al. 2004).”
From Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication (2026) · cites this paper as Winkler et al. 1997
Foamy viruses contain the classical LTR promoter that expresses the structural genes Gag/Pro/Pol and additionally have an internal promoter (IP) located toward the 3′ end of the env gene that can express only the two early regulatory genes tas and bet.
“They contain the classical LTR promoter that expresses the structural genes Gag/Pro/Pol, but additionally also have an internal promoter (IP) located toward the 3′ end of the env gene that can express only the two early regulatory genes, tas and bet.”
From Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication (2026) · cites this paper as Winkler et al. 1997
Cites
Rhee, S. S., & Hunter, E. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90289-q · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Foamy Virus Gag Proteins: What Makes Them Different?
Müllers, E. (2013) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v5041023 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Feline foamy virus Tas protein is a DNA-binding transactivator
Omoto, S., Brisibe, E. A., Okuyama, H., & Fujii, Y. R. (2004) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/vir.0.80088-0 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication
Jehad, M. A., Ali, L. M., Pillai, V. N., Prabhu, S. G., Mustafa, F., & Rizvi, T. A. (2026) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuaf066 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The basal activity of both promoters can be trans -activated by the Tas ( trans -activator of spumavirus ) protein (Baunach et al. 1993 , Winkler et al. 1997 , Omoto et al. 2004 ).”
- Authors
- Winkler, I., Bodem, J., Haas, L., Zemba, M., Delius, H., Flower, R., Flügel, R. M., & Löchelt, M.
- Affiliations
- German Cancer Research Center (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 6727-6741
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- PMC
- PMC191953
- OpenAlex
- W2159340599
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Infectious Diseases and Mycology
- Keywords
- feline foamy virus, Gag protein, protease active site, long terminal repeat promoter, proviral DNA
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Cats, Cattle, Cell Line, Cloning, Molecular, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Viral, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Primates, Proviruses, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Retroviridae Proteins, Viral Proteins, Blotting, Southern, Immunoblotting, Trans-Activators, Gene Products, gag, Gene Products, pol, Gene Products, env, Spumavirus, Genome, Viral, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review