The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organization of Human Papillomavirus Productive Cycle during Neoplastic Progression Provides a Basis for Selection of Diagnostic Markers
Open accessAbstract
The productive cycle of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) can be divided into discrete phases. Cell proliferation and episomal maintenance in the lower epithelial layers are followed by genome amplification and the expression of capsid proteins. These events, which occur in all productive infections, can be distinguished by using antibodies to viral gene products or to surrogate markers of their expression. Here we have compared precancerous lesions caused by HPV type 16 (HPV16) with lesions caused by HPV types that are not generally associated with human cancer. These include HPV2 and HPV11, which are related to HPV16 (supergroup A), as well as HPV1 and HPV65, which are evolutionarily divergent (supergroups E and B). HPV16-induced low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN1) are productive infections which resemble those caused by other HPV types. During progression to cancer, however, the activation of late events is delayed, and the thickness of the proliferative compartment is progressively increased. In many HPV16-induced high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN3), late events are restricted to small areas close to the epithelial surface. Such heterogeneity in the organization of the productive cycle was seen only in lesions caused by HPV16 and was not apparent when lesions caused by other HPV types were compared. By contrast, the order in which events in the productive cycle were initiated was invariant and did not depend on the infecting HPV type or the severity of disease. The distribution of viral gene products in the infected cervix depends on the extent to which the virus can complete its productive cycle, which in turn reflects the severity of cervical neoplasia. It appears from our work that the presence of such proteins in cells at the epithelial surface allows the severity of the underlying disease to be predicted and that markers of viral gene expression may improve cervical screening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer
Doorbar, J. (2006) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20050369 · Cited by 1,072
Self-citationHuman papillomaviruses: basic mechanisms of pathogenesis and oncogenicity
Hebner, C. M., & Laimins, L. A. (2006) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.488 · Cited by 401
Kraus, I., Molden, T., Holm, R., Lie, A. K., Karlsen, F., Kristensen, G. B., & Skomedal, H. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.44.4.1310-1317.2006 · Cited by 123
Kranjec, C., Holleywood, C., Libert, D., Griffin, H., Mahmood, R., Isaacson, E., & Doorbar, J. (2017) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4917 · Cited by 47
Self-citationLeong, C. M., Doorbar, J., Nindl, I., Yoon, H.-S., & Hibma, M. H. (2010) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2009.266 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Middleton, K., Peh, W., Southern, S., Griffin, H., Sotlar, K., Nakahara, T., El-Sherif, A., Morris, L., Seth, R., Hibma, M., Jenkins, D., Lambert, P., Coleman, N., & Doorbar, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 10186-10201
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- OpenAlex
- W1974373460
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization of Human Papillomavirus Productive Cycle during Neoplastic Progression Provides a Basis for Selection of Diagnostic Markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jvi.77.19.10186-10201.2003
- The paper
- Middleton, K., Peh, W., Southern, S., Griffin, H., Sotlar, K., Nakahara, T., El-Sherif, A., Morris, L., Seth, R., Hibma, M., Jenkins, D., Lambert, P., Coleman, N., & Doorbar, J. (2003). Organization of Human Papillomavirus Productive Cycle during Neoplastic Progression Provides a Basis for Selection of Diagnostic Markers. Journal of Virology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.77.19.10186-10201.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.