The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CD8+T Cells Mediate Recovery andImmunopathology in West Nile VirusEncephalitis
Open accessAbstract
C57BL/6J mice infected intravenously with the Sarafend strain of West Nile virus (WNV) develop a characteristic central nervous system (CNS) disease, including an acute inflammatory reaction. Dose response studies indicate two distinct kinetics of mortality. At high doses of infection (10 8 PFU), direct infection of the brain occurred within 24 h, resulting in 100% mortality with a 6-day mean survival time (MST), and there was minimal destruction of neural tissue. A low dose (10 3 PFU) of infection resulted in 27% mortality (MST, 11 days), and virus could be detected in the CNS 7 days postinfection (p.i.). Virus was present in the hypogastric lymph nodes and spleens at days 4 to 7 p.i. Histology of the brains revealed neuronal degeneration and inflammation within leptomeninges and brain parenchyma. Inflammatory cell infiltration was detectable in brains from day 4 p.i. onward in the high-dose group and from day 7 p.i. in the low-dose group, with the severity of infiltration increasing over time. The cellular infiltrates in brain consisted predominantly of CD8+, but not CD4+, T cells. CD8+T cells in the brain and the spleen expressed the activation markers CD69 early and expressed CD25 at later time points. CD8+T-cell-deficient mice infected with 10 3 PFU of WNV showed increased mortalities but prolonged MST and early infection of the CNS compared to wild-type mice. Using high doses of virus in CD8-deficient mice leads to increased survival. These results provide evidence that CD8+T cells are involved in both recovery and immunopathology in WNV infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
West Nile Virus: A Reemerging Global Pathogen
Petersen, L. R., & Roehrig, J. T. (2001) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0704.017401 · Cited by 435
Cited by
Neuronal CXCL10 Directs CD8 + T-Cell Recruitment and Control of West Nile Virus Encephalitis
Klein, R. S., Lin, E., Zhang, B., Luster, A. D., Tollett, J., Samuel, M. A., Engle, M., & Diamond, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.79.17.11457-11466.2005 · Cited by 424
Microglia and monocytes in inflammatory CNS disease: integrating phenotype and function
Spiteri, A. G., Wishart, C. L., Pamphlett, R., Locatelli, G., & King, N. J. C. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-021-02384-2 · Cited by 216
Key role of T cell defects in age-related vulnerability to West Nile virus
Brien, J. D., Uhrlaub, J. L., Hirsch, A., Wiley, C. A., & Nikolich-Žugich, J. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20090222 · Cited by 158
West Nile Virus: Immunity and Pathogenesis
Lim, S. M., Koraka, P., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., & Martina, B. E. E. (2011) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v3060811 · Cited by 133
Hedrick, S. M. (2004) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2004.08.020 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Lobigs, M., Lee, E., & Müllbacher, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-12-15
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 13323-13334
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2005262608
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.