Cited by 91Mosquito-borne diseases and controlViral Infections and VectorsInfluenza Virus Research Studies

Humoral and Cellular Immune Response to RNA Immunization with Flavivirus Replicons Derived from Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus

Open access
Aberle, Judith H., Aberle, Stephan W., Kofler, Regina M., Mandl, Christian W.·2005·Journal of Virology

Abstract

A new vaccination principle against flaviviruses, based on a tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) self-replicating noninfectious RNA vaccine that produces subviral particles, has recently been introduced (R. M. Kofler, J. H. Aberle, S. W. Aberle, S. L. Allison, F. X. Heinz, and C. W. Mandl, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 7:1951-1956, 2004). In this study, we evaluated the potential of the self-replicating RNA vaccine in mice in comparison to those of live, attenuated vaccines and a formalin-inactivated whole-virus vaccine (ImmunInject). For this purpose, mice were immunized using gene gun-mediated application of the RNA vaccine and tested for CD8+T-cell responses, long-term duration, neutralizing capacity, and isotype profile of specific antibodies and protection against lethal virus challenge. We demonstrate that the self-replicating RNA vaccine induced a broad-based, humoral and cellular (Th1 and CD8+T-cell response) immune response comparable to that induced by live vaccines and that it protected mice from challenge. Even a single immunization with 1 μg of the replicon induced a long-lasting antibody response, characterized by high neutralizing antibody titers, which were sustained for at least 1 year. Nevertheless, it was possible to boost this response further by a second injection with the RNA vaccine, even in the presence of a concomitant CD8+T-cell response. In this way it was possible to induce a balanced humoral and cellular immune response, similar to infection-induced immunity but without the safety hazards of infectious agents. The results also demonstrate the value of TBEV replicon RNA for inducing protective long-lasting antiviral responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.79.24.15107-15113.2005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aberle, J. H., Aberle, S. W., Kofler, R. M., & Mandl, C. W.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Mandl, Christian W.
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2005-12-15
Volume
79
Issue
24
Pages
15107-15113
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2106595509
Cited by
91
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
Keywords
tick-borne encephalitis virus, gene gun immunization, CD8+ T cell responses, Th1 response, neutralizing antibodies, humoral immune response, cell-mediated immunity, live attenuated vaccine, formalin-inactivated vaccine, protective immunity, booster vaccination
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibody Formation, Dengue, Dengue Virus, Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne, Encephalitis, Tick-Borne, Immunity, Cellular, Immunization, Passive, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Culicidae, Replicon, RNA, Viral, Vaccination, Viral Vaccines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review