The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CRISPR Immunity Drives Rapid Phage Genome Evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus
Open accessAbstract
Many bacteria rely on CRISPR-Cas systems to provide adaptive immunity against phages, predation by which can shape the ecology and functioning of microbial communities. To characterize the impact of CRISPR immunization on phage genome evolution, we performed long-term bacterium-phage ( Streptococcus thermophilus -phage 2972) coevolution experiments. We found that in this species, CRISPR immunity drives fixation of single nucleotide polymorphisms that accumulate exclusively in phage genome regions targeted by CRISPR. Mutation rates in phage genomes highly exceed those of the host. The presence of multiple phages increased phage persistence by enabling recombination-based formation of chimeric phage genomes in which sequences heavily targeted by CRISPR were replaced. Collectively, our results establish CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity as a key driver of phage genome evolution under the conditions studied and highlight the importance of multiple coexisting phages for persistence in natural systems. IMPORTANCE Phages remain an enigmatic part of the biosphere. As predators, they challenge the survival of host bacteria and archaea and set off an “arms race” involving host immunization countered by phage mutation. The CRISPR-Cas system is adaptive: by capturing fragments of a phage genome upon exposure, the host is positioned to counteract future infections. To investigate this process, we initiated massive deep-sequencing experiments with a host and infective phage and tracked the coevolution of both populations over hundreds of days. In the present study, we found that CRISPR immunity drives the accumulation of phage genome rearrangements (which enable longer phage survival) and escape mutations, establishing CRISPR as one of the fundamental drivers of phage evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Cited by
Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature’s Toolbox for Genome Engineering
Wright, A. V., Nuñez, J. K., & Doudna, J. A. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.035 · Cited by 989
The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes
Hampton, H. G., Watson, B. N. J., & Fineran, P. C. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1894-8 · Cited by 917
CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes
Marraffini, L. A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15386 · Cited by 829
The evolution of genome mining in microbes – a review
Ziemert, N., Alanjary, M., & Weber, T. (2016) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/c6np00025h · Cited by 688
A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications
Barrangou, R., & Horvath, P. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.92 · Cited by 319
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Paez-Espino, D., Sharon, I., Morovic, W., Stahl, B., Thomas, B. C., Barrangou, R., & Banfield, J. F.
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-2129
- OpenAlex
- W2140372517
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CRISPR Immunity Drives Rapid Phage Genome Evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mbio.00262-15
- The paper
- Paez-Espino, D., Sharon, I., Morovic, W., Stahl, B., Thomas, B. C., Barrangou, R., & Banfield, J. F. (2015). CRISPR Immunity Drives Rapid Phage Genome Evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00262-15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.