The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular insights into the dual activation of PomZ, a ParA/MinD P-loop ATPase, by the two ATPase-activating proteins PomX and PomY
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Positioning of the division site is precisely regulated. In Myxococcus xanthus , the PomX/Y/Z assembly associates with and translocates across the nucleoid in a PomZ ATPase-dependent manner to position the cytokinetic FtsZ ring at midcell. Unlike other systems incorporating a ParA/MinD ATPase, the PomX/Y/Z system incorporates two ATPase-activating proteins (AAPs), PomX and PomY, that stimulate PomZ activity. While PomX AAP activity, similarly to that of other characterized AAPs of ParA/MinD ATPases, resides in a short positively charged N-terminal peptide (PomX NPEP ), the mechanism of PomY-mediated PomZ activation remained unknown. We map PomY AAP activity to its C-terminal residues 496–682 (PomY 496-682 ) and show that this activity is important for division site positioning and the initiation of division. Structural modeling suggests a bipartite PomY 496-682 architecture, comprising a globular domain and an intrinsically disordered region containing the short α5 helix. However, this modeling suggests an interaction only between α5 and the PomZ dimer. The suggested α5 binding site partially overlaps with that of the prototype AAP ParB on the ParA dimer, but α5 lacks a positively charged residue critical for ParB AAP activity. Structural modeling suggests that PomX NPEP binds the PomZ dimer at a site distinct from that of α5 and that overlaps with that of the prototype AAP MinE on the MinD dimer. These findings reveal a non-canonical AAP mechanism of PomY, while PomX NPEP likely functions analogously to MinE, indicating that PomX and PomY act in concert through distinct but complementary mechanisms to stimulate PomZ ATPase activity, thereby efficiently driving the positioning of the cytokinetic FtsZ ring. IMPORTANCE: In bacteria, the regulatory systems that position the division site often incorporate a ParA/MinD ATPase. These ATPases also function in the positioning of numerous other macromolecular complexes in bacteria. Characteristically, these ATPases depend on stimulation of their ATPase activity by a single cognate ATPase-activating protein (AAP). However, the Myxococcus xanthus cell division regulatory PomX/Y/Z system stands out by incorporating two AAPs, PomX and PomY, that activate the PomZ ATPase. Similar to other AAPs, PomX uses a short, positively charged N-terminal peptide (PomX NPEP ) to stimulate PomZ activity. We map PomY AAP activity to a C-terminal region spanning residues 496–682 (PomY 496-682 ). Structural modeling using AlphaFold 3 suggests that the AAP activity of PomY 496-682 and PomX NPEP may involve two distinct, non-overlapping binding sites at the dimer interface of ATP-bound PomZ. Altogether, these results provide insights into the molecular mechanism of activation by two AAPs of a ParA/MinD ATPase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- 10.1016/j.tim.2019.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41579-023-00942-x · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095657 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2024.102485 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tim.2012.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-39513-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/mmi.12094 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600530 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2009.120 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07536.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkz314 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky1251 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.02758 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.232590599 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03321.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07314.x · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa192 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0705196105 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06465.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.102059099 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07507.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08110.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.038 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-025-63976-0 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.66160 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/18.5.1415 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00273-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0607216104 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.39723 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M109.044800 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2010.207 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb2083 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.042 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2419610121 · DOI
- 10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.051812706 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M115.679407 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkn1046 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/16.8.1992 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.185.16.4948-4955.2003 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-023-02087-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5952 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2011.291 · DOI
- 10.3791/57860 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.01502-07 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2938 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.62.3.293-300.1951 · DOI
- 10.1111/mmi.13264 · DOI
- Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06891.x · DOI
- 10.1016/s0003-2697(03)00461-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1202 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkae241 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.849004 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx922 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa977 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkh479 · DOI
- 10.1385/1-59259-584-7:531 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15252/msb.202311544 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Klos, P., Harms, A., & Søgaard-Andersen, L.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology (DE)
- Department of Ecophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2026-05-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e0042526-e0042526
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7154492561
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- Myxococcus xanthus, FtsZ ring, cytokinesis, intrinsically disordered regions, mines, ParB, protein-protein interaction
- MeSH terms
- Adenosine Triphosphatases, Bacterial Proteins, Cell Division, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Myxococcus xanthus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review