Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probiotic Diversity Enhances Rhizosphere Microbiome Function and Plant Disease Suppression

Open access
Hu, Jie, Wei, Zhong, Friman, Ville-Petri, Gu, Shao-hua, Wang, Xiao-fang, Eisenhauer, Nico, Yang, Tian-jie, Ma, Jing, Shen, Qi-rong, Xu, Yang-chun, Jousset, Alexandre·2016·mBio

Abstract

Bacterial communities associated with plant roots play an important role in the suppression of soil-borne pathogens, and multispecies probiotic consortia may enhance disease suppression efficacy. Here we introduced defined Pseudomonas species consortia into naturally complex microbial communities and measured the importance of Pseudomonas community diversity for their survival and the suppression of the bacterial plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum in the tomato rhizosphere microbiome. The survival of introduced Pseudomonas consortia increased with increasing diversity. Further, high Pseudomonas diversity reduced pathogen density in the rhizosphere and decreased the disease incidence due to both intensified resource competition and interference with the pathogen. These results provide novel mechanistic insights into elevated pathogen suppression by diverse probiotic consortia in naturally diverse plant rhizospheres. Ecologically based community assembly rules could thus play a key role in engineering functionally reliable microbiome applications. IMPORTANCE The increasing demand for food supply requires more-efficient control of plant diseases. The use of probiotics, i.e., naturally occurring bacterial antagonists and competitors that suppress pathogens, has recently reemerged as a promising alternative to agrochemical use. It is, however, still unclear how many and which strains we should choose for constructing effective probiotic consortia. Here we present a general ecological framework for assembling effective probiotic communities based on in vitro characterization of community functioning. Specifically, we show that increasing the diversity of probiotic consortia enhances community survival in the naturally diverse rhizosphere microbiome, leading to increased pathogen suppression via intensified resource competition and interference with the pathogen. We propose that these ecological guidelines can be put to the test in microbiome engineering more widely in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.01790-16

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 411

Metadata

Authors
Hu, J., Wei, Z., Friman, V.-P., Gu, S.-H., Wang, X.-F., Eisenhauer, N., Yang, T.-J., Ma, J., Shen, Q.-R., Xu, Y.-C., & Jousset, A.
Venue
mBio
Published
2016-12-30
Volume
7
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-2129
OpenAlex
W2564018102
Cited by
411
References
40
FWCI
21.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probiotic Diversity Enhances Rhizosphere Microbiome Function and Plant Disease Suppression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mbio.01790-16
The paper
Hu, J., Wei, Z., Friman, V.-P., Gu, S.-H., Wang, X.-F., Eisenhauer, N., Yang, T.-J., Ma, J., Shen, Q.-R., Xu, Y.-C., & Jousset, A. (2016). Probiotic Diversity Enhances Rhizosphere Microbiome Function and Plant Disease Suppression. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01790-16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.