Cited by 336Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchHeat shock proteins research

SAHA shows preferential cytotoxicity in mutant p53 cancer cells by destabilizing mutant p53 through inhibition of the HDAC6-Hsp90 chaperone axis

Open access
Li, D, Marchenko, N D, Moll, U M·2011·Cell Death & Differentiation

Abstract

Mutant p53 (mutp53) cancers are surprisingly dependent on their hyperstable mutp53 protein for survival, identifying mutp53 as a potentially significant clinical target. However, exploration of effective small molecule therapies targeting mutp53 has barely begun. Mutp53 hyperstabilization, a hallmark of p53 mutation, is cancer cell-specific and due to massive upregulation of the HSP90 chaperone machinery during malignant transformation. We recently showed that stable complex formation between HSP90 and its mutp53 client inhibits E3 ligases MDM2 and CHIP, causing mutp53 stabilization. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors (HDACi) are a new class of promising anti-cancer drugs, hyperacetylating histone and non-histone targets. Currently, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) is the only FDA-approved HDACi. We show that SAHA exhibits preferential cytotoxicity for mutant, rather than wild-type and null p53 human cancer cells. Loss/gain-of-function experiments revealed that although able to exert multiple cellular effects, SAHA's cytotoxicity is caused to a significant degree by its ability to strongly destabilize mutp53 at the level of protein degradation. The underlying mechanism is SAHA's inhibition of HDAC6, an essential positive regulator of HSP90. This releases mutp53 and enables its MDM2- and CHIP-mediated degradation. SAHA also strongly chemosensitizes mutp53 cancer cells for chemotherapy due to its ability to degrade mutp53. This identifies a novel action of SAHA with the prospect of SAHA becoming a centerpiece in mutp53-specific anticancer strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cdd.2011.71

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HDAC inhibitor SAHA shows strong effects in destabilizing mut-p53 by dissociating HDAC6 from functional interaction with Hsp90 and thereby inhibits glioblastoma growth and resistance to chemotherapy.

    “HDAC inhibitor SAHA shows strong effects in destabilizing mut-p53 by dissociating HDAC6 from functional interaction with Hsp90 and thereby inhibits GBM growth and resistance to chemotherapy [142,143,144,145,146].”

    From The p53 Pathway in Glioblastoma (2018) · cites this paper as [142]

    The Results and Discussion report that SAHA inhibits HDAC6, disrupts Hsp90’s interaction with mutant p53, and sensitizes mutant-p53 cancer cells to chemotherapy. They do not report dissociation of HDAC6 from Hsp90. The Methods list breast, colon, prostate, pancreatic, and ovarian mutant-p53 cell lines, not glioblastoma cells, so the claimed effect on GBM growth and chemotherapy resistance is not established by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, D., Marchenko, N. D., & Moll, U. M.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Marchenko, N D
  • Moll, U M
Venue
Cell Death & Differentiation
Published
2011-06-03
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
1904-1913
ISSN
  • 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5403
OpenAlex
W2075676198
Cited by
336
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe
  • Stony Brook University
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA060664, CA0664, R01CA093853, CA93853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
mutant p53, vorinostat, HDAC6, HSP90, protein stabilization, MDM2, CHIP, E3 ubiquitin ligase, protein degradation, histone deacetylase inhibitors, chemosensitization
MeSH terms
Histone Deacetylase 6, Vorinostat, Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Movement, Cell Survival, Clinical Trials as Topic, Enzyme Activation, Histone Deacetylases, Humans, Hydroxamic Acids, Leupeptins, Down-Regulation, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Cell Line, Tumor, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Mutant Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, Protein Stability, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Proteolysis, Proteasome Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review