The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid and Preferential Activation of the c- jun Gene during the Mammalian UV Response
Abstract
Exposure of mammalian cells to DNA-damaging agents leads to activation of a genetic response known as the UV response. Because several previously identified UV-inducible genes contain AP-1 binding sites within their promoters, we investigated the induction of AP-1 activity by DNA-damaging agents. We found that expression of both c-jun and c-fos, which encode proteins that participate in formation of the AP-1 complex, is rapidly induced by two different DNA-damaging agents: UV and H2O2. Interestingly, the c-jun gene is far more responsive to UV than any other immediate-early gene that was examined, including c-fos. Other jun and fos genes were only marginally affected by UV or H2O2. Furthermore, UV is a much more efficient inducer of c-jun than phorbol esters, the standard inducers of c-jun expression. This preferential response of the c-jun gene is mediated by its 5' control region and requires the TPA response element, suggesting that this element also serves as an early target for the signal transduction pathway elicited by DNA damage. Both UV and H2O2 lead to a long-lasting increase in AP-1 binding activity, suggesting that AP-1 may mediate the induction of other damage-inducible genes such as human collagenase.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, phosphorylation of serine residues at positions 63 and 73 of c-Jun is important for its activity.”
From AKT Induces Transcriptional Activity of PU.1 through Phosphorylation-mediated Modifications within Its Transactivation Domain (2001) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
The jun proto-oncogene is positively autoregulated by its product, Jun/AP-1
Angel, P., Hattori, K., Smeal, T., & Karin, M. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90143-2 · Cited by 1,239
Self-citationExpression of cyr61, a growth factor-inducible immediate-early gene.
O'Brien, T. P., Yang, G. P., Sanders, L., & Lau, L. F. (1990) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.10.7.3569 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Free Radicals in the Physiological Control of Cell Function
Dröge, W. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2001 · Cited by 9,855
Dérijard, B., Hibi, M., Wu, I.-H., Barrett, T., Su, B., Deng, T., Karin, M., & Davis, R. J. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90380-8 · Cited by 3,188
Self-citationAP-1 as a regulator of cell life and death
Shaulian, E., & Karin, M. (2002) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb0502-e131 · Cited by 2,961
Self-citationStrategies of antioxidant defense
SIES, H. (1993) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18025.x · Cited by 1,976
Dithiocarbamates as potent inhibitors of nuclear factor kappa B activation in intact cells.
Schreck, R., Meier, B., Männel, D. N., Dröge, W., & Baeuerle, P. A. (1992) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.175.5.1181 · Cited by 1,508
Metadata
- Authors
- Devary, Y., Gottlieb, R. A., Lau, L. F., & Karin, M.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2804-2811
- ISSN
- 0270-7306
- 1098-5549
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review