The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Absence of Apparent Phenotype in Mice Lacking Cdc25C Protein Phosphatase
Open accessAbstract
The Cdc25 family of protein phosphatases positively regulate the cell division cycle by activating cyclin-dependent protein kinases. In humans and rodents, three Cdc25 family members denoted Cdc25A, -B, and -C have been identified. The murine forms of Cdc25 exhibit distinct patterns of expression both during development and in adult mouse tissues. In order to determine unique contributions made by the Cdc25C protein phosphatase to embryonic and adult cell cycles, mice lacking Cdc25C were generated. We report that Cdc25C(-/-) mice are viable and do not display any obvious abnormalities. Among adult tissues in which Cdc25C is detected, its transcripts are most abundant in testis, followed by thymus, ovary, spleen, and intestine. Mice lacking Cdc25C were fertile, indicating that Cdc25C does not contribute an essential function during spermatogenesis or oogenesis in the mouse. T- and B-cell development was also found to be normal in Cdc25C(-/-) mice, and Cdc25C(-/-) mouse splenic T and B cells exhibited normal proliferative responses in vitro. Finally, the phosphorylation status of Cdc2, the timing of entry into mitosis, and the cellular response to DNA damage were unperturbed in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking Cdc25C. These findings indicate that Cdc25A and/or Cdc25B may compensate for loss of Cdc25C in the mouse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid Destruction of Human Cdc25A in Response to DNA Damage
Mailand, N., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Syljuåsen, R. G., Welcker, M., Bartek, J., & Lukas, J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5470.1425 · Cited by 787
Cited by
Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian DNA Repair and the DNA Damage Checkpoints
Sancar, A., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Ünsal-Kaçmaz, K., & Linn, S. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723 · Cited by 3,317
Regulating mammalian checkpoints through Cdc25 inactivation
Donzelli, M., & Draetta, G. F. (2003) · EMBO reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.embor887 · Cited by 438
The when and wheres of CDC25 phosphatases
Boutros, R., Dozier, C., & Ducommun, B. (2006) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2006.02.003 · Cited by 414
Chk2 kinase — a busy messenger
Bartek, J., Falck, J., & Lukas, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35103059 · Cited by 403
Chk1 mediates S and G2 arrests through Cdc25A degradation in response to DNA-damaging agents
Xiao, Z., Chen, Z., Gunasekera, A. H., Sowin, T. J., Rosenberg, S. H., Fesik, S., & Zhang, H. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m300229200 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, M.-S., Hurov, J., White, L. S., Woodford-Thomas, T., & Piwnica-Worms, H.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3853-3861
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2125003296
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absence of Apparent Phenotype in Mice Lacking Cdc25C Protein Phosphatase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.21.12.3853-3861.2001
- The paper
- Chen, M.-S., Hurov, J., White, L. S., Woodford-Thomas, T., & Piwnica-Worms, H. (2001). Absence of Apparent Phenotype in Mice Lacking Cdc25C Protein Phosphatase. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.21.12.3853-3861.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.