The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulation of DNA Synthesis Activity of Human DNA Polymerase κ by PCNA
Open accessAbstract
Humans have three DNA polymerases, Poleta, Polkappa, and Poliota, which are able to promote replication through DNA lesions. However, the mechanism by which these DNA polymerases are targeted to the replication machinery stalled at a lesion site has remained unknown. Here, we provide evidence for the physical interaction of human Polkappa (hPolkappa) with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and show that PCNA, replication factor C (RFC), and replication protein A (RPA) act cooperatively to stimulate the DNA synthesis activity of hPolkappa. The processivity of hPolkappa, however, is not significantly increased in the presence of these protein factors. The efficiency (V(max)/K(m)) of correct nucleotide incorporation by hPolkappa is enhanced approximately 50- to 200-fold in the presence of PCNA, RFC, and RPA, and this increase in efficiency is achieved by a reduction in the apparent K(m) for the nucleotide. Although in the presence of these protein factors, the efficiency of the insertion of an A nucleotide opposite an abasic site is increased approximately 40-fold, this reaction still remains quite inefficient; thus, it is unlikely that hPolkappa would bypass an abasic site by inserting a nucleotide opposite the site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biochemical Basis of DNA Replication Fidelity
Goodman, M. F., Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., Petruska, J., & Kunkel, T. A. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239309086792 · Cited by 446 · cited 1×
“residue or an abasic site were performed as described previously (3, 5).”
MethodRoles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis
Tang, M., Pham, P., Shen, X., Taylor, J.-S., O'Donnell, M., Woodgate, R., & Goodman, M. F. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35010020 · Cited by 443
polι, a remarkably error-prone human DNA polymerase
Tissier, A., McDonald, J. P., Frank, E. G., & Woodgate, R. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.13.1642 · Cited by 315
Cited by
Error-Prone Repair DNA Polymerases in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Goodman, M. F. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.124707 · Cited by 727
Eukaryotic Translesion Polymerases and Their Roles and Regulation in DNA Damage Tolerance
Waters, L. S., Minesinger, B. K., Wiltrout, M. E., D'Souza, S., Woodruff, R. V., & Walker, G. C. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00034-08 · Cited by 591
Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: A one- or two-polymerase affair
Prakash, S., & Prakash, L. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1009802 · Cited by 344
Self-citationMcIlwraith, M. J., Vaisman, A., Liu, Y., Fanning, E., Woodgate, R., & West, S. C. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.001 · Cited by 306
How DNA lesions are turned into mutations within cells?
Pagès, V., & Fuchs, R. P. (2002) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206006 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Haracska, L., Unk, I., Johnson, R. E., Phillips, B. B., Hurwitz, J., Prakash, L., & Prakash, S.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 784-791
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2127839728
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulation of DNA Synthesis Activity of Human DNA Polymerase κ by PCNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.22.3.784-791.2002
- The paper
- Haracska, L., Unk, I., Johnson, R. E., Phillips, B. B., Hurwitz, J., Prakash, L., & Prakash, S. (2002). Stimulation of DNA Synthesis Activity of Human DNA Polymerase κ by PCNA. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.22.3.784-791.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.