The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RAD51-Dependent Break-Induced Replication Differs in Kinetics and Checkpoint Responses from RAD51-Mediated Gene Conversion
Open accessAbstract
Diploid Saccharomyces cells experiencing a double-strand break (DSB) on one homologous chromosome repair the break by RAD51-mediated gene conversion >98% of the time. However, when extensive homologous sequences are restricted to one side of the DSB, repair can occur by both RAD51-dependent and RAD51-independent break-induced replication (BIR) mechanisms. Here we characterize the kinetics and checkpoint dependence of RAD51-dependent BIR when the DSB is created within a chromosome. Gene conversion products appear within 2 h, and there is little, if any, induction of the DNA damage checkpoint; however, RAD51-dependent BIR occurs with a further delay of 2 to 4 h and cells arrest in response to the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. RAD51-dependent BIR does not require special facilitating sequences that are required for a less efficient RAD51-independent process. RAD51-dependent BIR occurs efficiently in G(2)-arrested cells. Once repair is initiated, the rate of repair replication during BIR is comparable to that of normal DNA replication, as copying of >100 kb is completed less than 30 min after repair DNA synthesis is detected close to the DSB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An alternative pathway for yeast telomere maintenance rescues est1− senescence
Lundblad, V., & Blackburn, E. H. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90234-h · Cited by 942
Cited by
Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes
Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T., & Liu, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955 · Cited by 1,066
Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart
Petermann, E., & Helleday, T. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2974 · Cited by 340
DNA Repair in Mammalian Cells: DNA double-strand break repair: how to fix a broken relationship
Pardo, B., Gómez-González, B., & Aguilera, A. (2009) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-009-8740-3 · Cited by 280
Payen, C., Koszul, R., Dujon, B., & Fischer, G. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000175 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Malkova, A., Naylor, M. L., Yamaguchi, M., Ira, G., & Haber, J. E.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 933-944
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2069839388
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RAD51-Dependent Break-Induced Replication Differs in Kinetics and Checkpoint Responses from RAD51-Mediated Gene Conversion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.25.3.933-944.2005
- The paper
- Malkova, A., Naylor, M. L., Yamaguchi, M., Ira, G., & Haber, J. E. (2005). RAD51-Dependent Break-Induced Replication Differs in Kinetics and Checkpoint Responses from RAD51-Mediated Gene Conversion. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.25.3.933-944.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.