Cited by 28Innovative Teaching MethodsScience Education and PedagogyEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Taking a Scientific Approach to Science Education, Part II—Changing Teaching: Challenges remain before universities more widely adopt research-based approaches, despite their many benefits over lecture-based teaching

Wieman, Carl, Gilbert, Sarah·2015·Microbe Magazine

Abstract

In Part I of “Taking a Scientific Approach to Science Education” (Microbe, April 2015, p. 152) we focused on the research on learning and teaching in undergraduate science. Our focus here is to address why these improved teaching methods are not the norm in college and university science classes, and what it will take to achieve widespread adoption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/microbe.10.203.1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wieman, C., & Gilbert, S.
Venue
Microbe Magazine
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
203-207
ISSN
  • 1558-7452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7460
OpenAlex
W2401841067
Cited by
28
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6
FWCI
19.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Microbe Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
undergraduate science education, teaching methods, evidence-based teaching, science teaching reform, learning research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review