The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Utilization of Glyphosate as Phosphate Source: Biochemistry and Genetics of Bacterial Carbon-Phosphorus Lyase
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: After several decades of use of glyphosate, the active ingredient in weed killers such as Roundup, in fields, forests, and gardens, the biochemical pathway of transformation of glyphosate phosphorus to a useful phosphorus source for microorganisms has been disclosed. Glyphosate is a member of a large group of chemicals, phosphonic acids or phosphonates, which are characterized by a carbon-phosphorus bond. This is in contrast to the general phosphorus compounds utilized and metabolized by microorganisms. Here phosphorus is found as phosphoric acid or phosphate ion, phosphoric acid esters, or phosphoric acid anhydrides. The latter compounds contain phosphorus that is bound only to oxygen. Hydrolytic, oxidative, and radical-based mechanisms for carbon-phosphorus bond cleavage have been described. This review deals with the radical-based mechanism employed by the carbon-phosphorus lyase of the carbon-phosphorus lyase pathway, which involves reactions for activation of phosphonate, carbon-phosphorus bond cleavage, and further chemical transformation before a useful phosphate ion is generated in a series of seven or eight enzyme-catalyzed reactions. The phn genes, encoding the enzymes for this pathway, are widespread among bacterial species. The processes are described with emphasis on glyphosate as a substrate. Additionally, the catabolism of glyphosate is intimately connected with that of aminomethylphosphonate, which is also treated in this review. Results of physiological and genetic analyses are combined with those of bioinformatics analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances in glyphosate biodegradation
Zhan, H., Feng, Y., Fan, X., & Chen, S. (2018) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-018-9035-0 · Cited by 317
Treatment technologies and degradation pathways of glyphosate: A critical review
Feng, D., Soric, A., & Boutin, O. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140559 · Cited by 183
Widespread agrochemicals differentially affect zooplankton biomass and community structure
Hébert, M., Fugère, V., Beisner, B. E., Barbosa da Costa, N., Barrett, R. D. H., Bell, G., Shapiro, B. J., Yargeau, V., Gonzalez, A., & Fussmann, G. F. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2423 · Cited by 34
Jeon, S., Jung, J., Kim, K., Yoo, D., Lee, C., Kang, J., Cho, K., Kang, D.-K., Kwak, W., Yoon, S. H., et al. (2017) · Infection Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2017.05.015 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Hove-Jensen, B., Zechel, D. L., & Jochimsen, B.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 176-197
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2152411977
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utilization of Glyphosate as Phosphate Source: Biochemistry and Genetics of Bacterial Carbon-Phosphorus Lyase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.00040-13
- The paper
- Hove-Jensen, B., Zechel, D. L., & Jochimsen, B. (2014). Utilization of Glyphosate as Phosphate Source: Biochemistry and Genetics of Bacterial Carbon-Phosphorus Lyase. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00040-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.