The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla
Open accessAbstract
The demarcation of protist kingdoms is reviewed, a complete revised classification down to the level of subclass is provided for the kingdoms Protozoa, Archezoa, and Chromista, and the phylogenetic basis of the revised classification is outlined. Removal of Archezoa because of their ancestral absence of mitochondria, peroxisomes, and Golgi dictyosomes makes the kingdom Protozoa much more homogeneous: they all either have mitochondria and peroxisomes or have secondarily lost them. Predominantly phagotrophic, Protozoa are distinguished from the mainly photosynthetic kingdom Chromista (Chlorarachniophyta, Cryptista, Heterokonta, and Haptophyta) by the absence of epiciliary retronemes (rigid thrust-reversing tubular ciliary hairs) and by the lack of two additional membranes outside their chloroplast envelopes. The kingdom Protozoa has two subkingdoms: Adictyozoa, without Golgi dictyosomes, containing only the phylum Percolozoa (flagellates and amoeboflagellates); and Dictyozoa, made up of 17 phyla with Golgi dictyosomes. Dictyozoa are divided into two branches: (i) Parabasalia, a single phylum with hydrogenosomes and 70S ribosomes but no mitochondria, Golgi dictyosomes associated with striated roots, and a kinetid of four or five cilia; and (ii) Bikonta (16 unicellular or plasmodial phyla with mitochondria and bikinetids and in which Golgi dictyosomes are not associated with striated ciliary roots), which are divided into two infrakingdoms: Euglenozoa (flagellates with discoid mitochondrial cristae and trans-splicing of miniexons for all nuclear genes) and Neozoa (15 phyla of more advanced protozoa with tubular or flat [usually nondiscoid] mitochondrial cristae and cis-spliced spliceosomal introns). Neozoa are divided into seven parvkingdoms: (i) Ciliomyxa (three predominantly ciliated phyla with tubular mitochondrial cristae but no cortical alveoli, i.e., Opalozoa [flagellates with tubular cristae], Mycetozoa [slime molds], and Choanozoa [choanoflagellates, with flattened cristae]); (ii) Alveolata (three phyla with cortical alveoli and tubular mitochondrial cristae, i.e., Dinozoa [Dinoflagellata and Protalveolata], Apicomplexa, and Ciliophora); (iii) Neosarcodina (phyla Rhizopoda [lobose and filose amoebae] and Reticulosa [foraminifera; reticulopodial amoebae], usually with tubular cristae); (iv) Actinopoda (two phyla with axopodia: Heliozoa and Radiozoa [Radiolaria, Acantharia]); (v) Entamoebia (a single phylum of amoebae with no mitochondria, peroxisomes, hydrogenosomes, or cilia and with transient intranuclear centrosomes); (vi) Myxozoa (three endoparasitic phyla with multicellular spores, mitochondria, and no cilia: Myxosporidia, Haplosporidia, and Paramyxia); and (vii) Mesozoa (multicells with tubular mitochondrial cristae, included in Protozoa because, unlike animals, they lack collagenous connective tissue).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Iwabe, N., Kuma, K., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S., & Miyata, T. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.23.9355 · Cited by 902
The Endosymbiont Hypothesis Revisited
Gray, M. W. (1992) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62068-9 · Cited by 586
The concept of cellular evolution
Woese, C. R., & Fox, G. E. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01796132 · Cited by 388
Protozoa as Hosts for Endosymbioses and the Conversion of Symbionts into Organelles1,2
CAVALIER‐SMITH, T., & LEE, J. J. (1985) · The Journal of Protozoology · doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1985.tb04031.x · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Cited by
Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., & Smetacek, V. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.200 · Cited by 2,848
A Molecular View of Microbial Diversity and the Biosphere
Pace, N. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5313.734 · Cited by 2,746
Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution.
Birky, C. W. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331 · Cited by 969
Gene transfer to the nucleus and the evolution of chloroplasts
Martin, W., Stoebe, B., Goremykin, V., Hansmann, S., Hasegawa, M., & Kowallik, K. V. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30234 · Cited by 772
Determining Divergence Times of the Major Kingdoms of Living Organisms with a Protein Clock
Doolittle, R. F., Feng, D.-F., Tsang, S., Cho, G., & Little, E. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5248.470 · Cited by 581
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavalier‐Smith, T.
- Venue
- Microbiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 953-994
- ISSN
- 0146-0749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1935558414
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.57.4.953-994.1993
- The paper
- Cavalier‐Smith, T. (1993). Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla. Microbiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.57.4.953-994.1993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.