The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recombinational Repair of DNA Damage in Escherichia coli and Bacteriophage λ
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Although homologous recombination and DNA repair phenomena in bacteria were initially extensively studied without regard to any relationship between the two, it is now appreciated that DNA repair and homologous recombination are related through DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, two-strand DNA damage, generated mostly during replication on a template DNA containing one-strand damage, is repaired by recombination with a homologous intact duplex, usually the sister chromosome. The two major types of two-strand DNA lesions are channeled into two distinct pathways of recombinational repair: daughter-strand gaps are closed by the RecF pathway, while disintegrated replication forks are reestablished by the RecBCD pathway. The phage λ recombination system is simpler in that its major reaction is to link two double-stranded DNA ends by using overlapping homologous sequences. The remarkable progress in understanding the mechanisms of recombinational repair in E. coli over the last decade is due to the in vitro characterization of the activities of individual recombination proteins. Putting our knowledge about recombinational repair in the broader context of DNA replication will guide future experimentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell division inhibitors SulA and MinCD prevent formation of the FtsZ ring
Bi, E., & Lutkenhaus, J. (1993) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.175.4.1118-1125.1993 · Cited by 407
Lowry, O. H., Carter, J., Ward, J. B., & Glaser, L. (1971) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)34144-4 · Cited by 350
DNA helicases: Enzymes with essential roles in all aspects of DNA metabolism
Matson, S. W., Bean, D. W., & George, J. W. (1994) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.950160103 · Cited by 293
Xer-mediated site-specific recombination in vitro
Colloms, S. D., McCulloch, R., Grant, K., Neilson, L., & Sherratt, D. J. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00456.x · Cited by 136
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
The importance of repairing stalled replication forks
Cox, M. M., Goodman, M. F., Kreuzer, K. N., Sherratt, D. J., Sandler, S. J., & Marians, K. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35003501 · Cited by 1,044
Oxidative Stress Resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans
Slade, D., & Radman, M. (2011) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00015-10 · Cited by 761
Error-Prone Repair DNA Polymerases in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Goodman, M. F. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.124707 · Cited by 727
Fu, J., Bian, X., Hu, S., Wang, H., Huang, F., Seibert, P. M., Plaza, A., Xia, L., Müller, R., Stewart, A. F., et al. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2183 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuzminov, A.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 751-813
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2133290100
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombinational Repair of DNA Damage in Escherichia coli and Bacteriophage λ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.63.4.751-813.1999
- The paper
- Kuzminov, A. (1999). Recombinational Repair of DNA Damage in Escherichia coli and Bacteriophage λ. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.63.4.751-813.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.