The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quorum Sensing in Nitrogen-Fixing Rhizobia
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Members of the rhizobia are distinguished for their ability to establish a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with leguminous plants. While many details of this relationship remain a mystery, much effort has gone into elucidating the mechanisms governing bacterium-host recognition and the events leading to symbiosis. Several signal molecules, including plant-produced flavonoids and bacterially produced nodulation factors and exopolysaccharides, are known to function in the molecular conversation between the host and the symbiont. Work by several laboratories has shown that an additional mode of regulation, quorum sensing, intercedes in the signal exchange process and perhaps plays a major role in preparing and coordinating the nitrogen-fixing rhizobia during the establishment of the symbiosis.Rhizobium leguminosarum, for example, carries a multitiered quorum-sensing system that represents one of the most complex regulatory networks identified for this form of gene regulation. This review focuses on the recent stream of information regarding quorum sensing in the nitrogen-fixing rhizobia. Seminal work on the quorum-sensing systems of R. leguminosarum bv.viciae,R. etli,Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234,Sinorhizobium meliloti, and Bradyrhizobium japonicum is presented and discussed. The latest work shows that quorum sensing can be linked to various symbiotic phenomena including nodulation efficiency, symbiosome development, exopolysaccharide production, and nitrogen fixation, all of which are important for the establishment of a successful symbiosis. Many questions remain to be answered, but the knowledge obtained so far provides a firm foundation for future studies on the role of quorum-sensing mediated gene regulation in host-bacterium interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellular Control of the Synthesis and Activity of the Bacterial Luminescent System
Nealson, K. H., Platt, T., & Hastings, J. W. (1970) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.104.1.313-322.1970 · Cited by 1,301
Cited by
Microbial Surface Colonization and Biofilm Development in Marine Environments
Dang, H., & Lovell, C. R. (2016) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00037-15 · Cited by 1,231
Hassan, S., & Mathesius, U. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err430 · Cited by 827
Beneficial Microorganisms for Corals (BMC): Proposed Mechanisms for Coral Health and Resilience
Peixoto, R. S., Rosado, P. M., Leite, D. C. D. A., Rosado, A. S., & Bourne, D. G. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00341 · Cited by 594
BHATTACHARYA, A., SOOD, P., & CITOVSKY, V. (2010) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00625.x · Cited by 485
Messing with Bacterial Quorum Sensing
González, J. E., & Keshavan, N. D. (2006) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-06 · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- González, J. E., & Marketon, M. M.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 574-592
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2146537129
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quorum Sensing in Nitrogen-Fixing Rhizobia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.67.4.574-592.2003
- The paper
- González, J. E., & Marketon, M. M. (2003). Quorum Sensing in Nitrogen-Fixing Rhizobia. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.67.4.574-592.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.