The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laboratory-Directed Protein Evolution
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Systematic approaches to directed evolution of proteins have been documented since the 1970s. The ability to recruit new protein functions arises from the considerable substrate ambiguity of many proteins. The substrate ambiguity of a protein can be interpreted as the evolutionary potential that allows a protein to acquire new specificities through mutation or to regain function via mutations that differ from the original protein sequence. All organisms have evolutionarily exploited this substrate ambiguity. When exploited in a laboratory under controlled mutagenesis and selection, it enables a protein to “evolve” in desired directions. One of the most effective strategies in directed protein evolution is to gradually accumulate mutations, either sequentially or by recombination, while applying selective pressure. This is typically achieved by the generation of libraries of mutants followed by efficient screening of these libraries for targeted functions and subsequent repetition of the process using improved mutants from the previous screening. Here we review some of the successful strategies in creating protein diversity and the more recent progress in directed protein evolution in a wide range of scientific disciplines and its impacts in chemical, pharmaceutical, and agricultural sciences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shaner, N. C., Campbell, R. E., Steinbach, P. A., Giepmans, B. N. G., Palmer, A. E., & Tsien, R. Y. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1037 · Cited by 4,619
Zengler, K., Toledo, G., Rappé, M., Elkins, J., Mathur, E. J., Short, J. M., & Keller, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252630999 · Cited by 796
Marzio, G., Verhoef, K., Vink, M., & Berkhout, B. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.111031498 · Cited by 81
Cited by
A system for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecules
Esvelt, K. M., Carlson, J. C., & Liu, D. R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09929 · Cited by 699
Protein Design by Directed Evolution
Jäckel, C., Kast, P., & Hilvert, D. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125832 · Cited by 409
Remote Control of Neuronal Signaling
Rogan, S. C., & Roth, B. L. (2011) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.110.003020 · Cited by 339
RNA Display Methods for the Discovery of Bioactive Macrocycles
Huang, Y., Wiedmann, M. M., & Suga, H. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00430 · Cited by 298
Enzymes and Bioconversions of Industrial, Pharmaceutical, and Biotechnological Significance
Sanchez, S., & Demain, A. L. (2011) · Organic Process Research & Development · doi:10.1021/op100302x · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, L., Kurek, I., English, J., & Keenan, R.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-392
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2096697992
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory-Directed Protein Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.69.3.373-392.2005
- The paper
- Yuan, L., Kurek, I., English, J., & Keenan, R. (2005). Laboratory-Directed Protein Evolution. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.69.3.373-392.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.