Cited by 339Photoreceptor and optogenetics researchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Remote Control of Neuronal Signaling

Open access
Rogan, Sarah C., Roth, Bryan L.·2011·Pharmacological Reviews

Abstract

A significant challenge for neuroscientists is to determine how both electrical and chemical signals affect the activity of cells and circuits and how the nervous system subsequently translates that activity into behavior. Remote, bidirectional manipulation of those signals with high spatiotemporal precision is an ideal approach to addressing that challenge. Neuroscientists have recently developed a diverse set of tools that permit such experimental manipulation with varying degrees of spatial, temporal, and directional control. These tools use light, peptides, and small molecules to primarily activate ion channels and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that in turn activate or inhibit neuronal firing. By monitoring the electrophysiological, biochemical, and behavioral effects of such activation/inhibition, researchers can better understand the links between brain activity and behavior. Here, we review the tools that are available for this type of experimentation. We describe the development of the tools and highlight exciting in vivo data. We focus primarily on designer GPCRs (receptors activated solely by synthetic ligands, designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs) and microbial opsins (e.g., channelrhodopsin-2, halorhodopsin, Volvox carteri channelrhodopsin) but also describe other novel techniques that use orthogonal receptors, caged ligands, allosteric modulators, and other approaches. These tools differ in the direction of their effect (activation/inhibition, hyperpolarization/depolarization), their onset and offset kinetics (milliseconds/minutes/hours), the degree of spatial resolution they afford, and their invasiveness. Although none of these tools is perfect, each has advantages and disadvantages, which we describe, and they are all still works in progress. We conclude with suggestions for improving upon the existing tools.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/pr.110.003020

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pausch MH, Price LA, Kajkowski EM, Strnad J, Dela Cruz F, Heinrich J, Ozenberger BA and Hadcock JR (1998) Heterologous G protein-coupled receptors expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: methods for genetic analysis and ligand identification, in Identification and Expression of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (Lynch KR ed) pp 196 -212, Wiley-Liss, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogan, S. C., & Roth, B. L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Pharmacological Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
291-315
ISSN
0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103253964
Cited by
339
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Triangle Community Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U19MH082441, MH087074, MH082441, R01MH061887, MH061887, F30MH087074)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008719, GM008719)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
optogenetics, microbial opsins, channelrhodopsin-2, halorhodopsin, DREADD, allosteric modulators, ion channel activation, G protein-coupled receptors, neuronal firing, brain-behavior relationship
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Ligands, Light, Neurons, Peptides, Designer Drugs, Signal Transduction, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Opsins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review