Cited by 49Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological Studies and Exploration

Evidence for pervasive petroleum generation and migration in 3.2 and 2.63 Ga shales

Rasmussen, Birger·2005·Geology

Abstract

Petroleum generation largely occurs through the thermal decomposition of organic matter. The presence of oil-bearing fluid inclusions and pyrobitumen in Archean rocks suggests that similar processes operated as early as ca. 3.25 Ga. However, direct evidence of petroleum generation from potential source rocks is lacking, and an abiogenic origin has been proposed for some Archean carbonaceous residues. Pilbara craton ca. 3.2 Ga and ca. 2.63 Ga black shales were found to contain abundant kerogenous streaks and laminae, as well as bitumen nodules (comprising a radioactive mineral core surrounded by a carbonaceous rim) and pyrobitumen (formerly petroleum) globules, films, and aggregates. The bitumen nodules formed around detrital radioactive grains via polymerization of fluid hydrocarbons generated within the shale and represent diagnostic indicators of oil generation in ancient shales. The bitumen globules, films, and masses are preserved within authigenic pyrite and demonstrate that a separate hydrocarbon phase had developed in the shale matrix during burial, providing compelling evidence for in situ petroleum generation and expulsion. The abundance of bitumen nodules and residual pyrobitumen in black shales across the Pilbara craton suggests that hydrocarbon generation from kerogenous shales was a common phenomenon during the Middle to Late Archean. The petroleum was generated from organic matter that accumulated in marine environments, most probably comprising the remains of photosynthetic and chemosynthetic organisms, pointing to a sizeable biomass as early as 3.2 Ga.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g21316.1

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous work suggests the Jeerinah Formation and other organic-rich Archean shales generated and expelled petroleum.

    “Previous work suggests that the Jeerinah Formation and other organic-rich Archean shales generated and expelled petroleum (17)”

    From Reappraisal of hydrocarbon biomarkers in Archean rocks (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasmussen, B.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Rasmussen, Birger
Venue
Geology
Published
2005
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
497
ISSN
0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971263356
Cited by
49
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geology (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
Keywords
hydrocarbon generation, hydrocarbon migration, pyrobitumen, authigenic pyrite, fluid inclusions, Pilbara Craton, chemosynthetic organisms, hydrocarbon expulsion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review