Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bedrock channel adjustment to tectonic forcing: Implications for predicting river incision rates

Whittaker, Alexander C., Cowie, Patience A., Attal, Mikaël, Tucker, Gregory E., Roberts, Gerald P.·2007·Geology

Abstract

Research Article| February 01, 2007 Bedrock channel adjustment to tectonic forcing: Implications for predicting river incision rates Alexander C. Whittaker; Alexander C. Whittaker 1Grant Institute of Earth Science, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Patience A. Cowie; Patience A. Cowie 1Grant Institute of Earth Science, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Mikaël Attal; Mikaël Attal 1Grant Institute of Earth Science, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gregory E. Tucker; Gregory E. Tucker 2Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gerald P. Roberts Gerald P. Roberts 3Joint Research School for Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Alexander C. Whittaker 1Grant Institute of Earth Science, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland, UK Patience A. Cowie 1Grant Institute of Earth Science, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland, UK Mikaël Attal 1Grant Institute of Earth Science, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland, UK Gregory E. Tucker 2Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399, USA Gerald P. Roberts 3Joint Research School for Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 27 Jul 2006 Revision Received: 14 Nov 2006 Accepted: 16 Nov 2006 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 Geological Society of America Geology (2007) 35 (2): 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1130/G23106A.1 Article history Received: 27 Jul 2006 Revision Received: 14 Nov 2006 Accepted: 16 Nov 2006 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Alexander C. Whittaker, Patience A. Cowie, Mikaël Attal, Gregory E. Tucker, Gerald P. Roberts; Bedrock channel adjustment to tectonic forcing: Implications for predicting river incision rates. Geology 2007;; 35 (2): 103–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G23106A.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract We present detailed data of channel morphology for a river undergoing a transient response to active normal faulting where excellent constraints exist on spatial and temporal variations in fault slip rates. We show that traditional hydraulic scaling laws break down in this situation, and that channel widths become decoupled from drainage area upstream of the fault. Unit stream powers are ∼4 times higher than those predicted by current scaling paradigms and imply that incision rates for rivers responding to active tectonics may be significantly higher than those heretofore modeled. The loss of hydraulic scaling cannot be explained by increasing channel roughness and is an intrinsic response to tectonic forcing. We show that channel aspect ratio is a strongly nonlinear function of local slope and demonstrate that fault-induced adjustment of channel geometries has reset hillslope gradients. The results give new insight into how rivers maintain their course in the face of tectonic uplift and illustrate the first-order control the fluvial system exerts on the locus and magnitude of sediment supply to basins. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g23106a.1

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Whittaker, A. C., Cowie, P. A., Attal, M., Tucker, G. E., & Roberts, G. P.
Venue
Geology
Published
2007
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
103
ISSN
0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146422575
Cited by
294
References
18
FWCI
23.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bedrock channel adjustment to tectonic forcing: Implications for predicting river incision rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/g23106a.1
The paper
Whittaker, A. C., Cowie, P. A., Attal, M., Tucker, G. E., & Roberts, G. P. (2007). Bedrock channel adjustment to tectonic forcing: Implications for predicting river incision rates. Geology. https://doi.org/10.1130/g23106a.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.