Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sedimentary response to Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum carbon release: A model-data comparison

Panchuk, K., Ridgwell, A., Kump, L.R.·2008·Geology

Abstract

Research Article| April 01, 2008 Sedimentary response to Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum carbon release: A model-data comparison K. Panchuk; K. Panchuk 1Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar A. Ridgwell; A. Ridgwell 2School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar L.R. Kump L.R. Kump 3Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (2008) 36 (4): 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24474A.1 Article history received: 01 Oct 2007 rev-recd: 17 Dec 2007 accepted: 19 Dec 2007 first online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation K. Panchuk, A. Ridgwell, L.R. Kump; Sedimentary response to Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum carbon release: A model-data comparison. Geology 2008;; 36 (4): 315–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G24474A.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Possible sources of carbon that may have caused global warming at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary are constrained using an intermediate complexity Earth-system model configured with early Eocene paleogeography. We find that 6800 Pg C (δ13C of –22‰) is the smallest pulse modeled here to reasonably reproduce observations of the extent of seafloor CaCO3 dissolution. This pulse could not have been solely the result of methane hydrate destabilization, suggesting that additional sources of CO2 such as volcanic CO2, the oxidation of sedimentary organic carbon, or thermogenic methane must also have contributed. Observed contrasts in dissolution intensity between Atlantic and Pacific sites are reproduced in the model by reducing bioturbation in the Atlantic during the event, simulating a potential consequence of the spread of low-oxygen bottom waters. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g24474a.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
Panchuk, K., Ridgwell, A., & Kump, L. R.
Venue
Geology
Published
2008
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
315
ISSN
0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125235413
Cited by
232
References
2
FWCI
14.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sedimentary response to Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum carbon release: A model-data comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/g24474a.1
The paper
Panchuk, K., Ridgwell, A., & Kump, L. R. (2008). Sedimentary response to Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum carbon release: A model-data comparison. Geology. https://doi.org/10.1130/g24474a.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.