The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing crustal thickness evolution from europium anomalies in detrital zircons
Abstract
A new data compilation shows that in intermediate to felsic rocks, zircon Eu/Eu* [chondrite normalized Eu/ ] correlates with whole rock La/Yb, which has been be used to infer crustal thickness. The resultant positive correlation between zircon Eu/Eu* and crustal thickness can be explained by two processes favored during high-pressure differentiation: (1) supression of plagioclase and (2) endogenic oxidation of Eu2+ due to garnet fractionation. Here we calibrate a crustal thickness proxy based on Eu anomalies in zircons. The Eu/Eu*-in-zircon proxy makes it possible to reconstruct crustal thickness evolution in magmatic arcs and orogens using detrital zircons. To evaluate this new proxy, we analyzed detrital zircons separated from modern river sands in the Gangdese belt, southern Tibet. Our results reveal two episodes of crustal thickening (to 60–70 km) since the Cretaceous. The first thickening event occurred at 90–70 Ma, and the second at 50–30 Ma following Eurasia-India collision. These findings are temporally consistent with contractional deformation of sedimentary strata in southern Tibet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The thickness of orogenic crust in the Mesoproterozoic has been recently questioned by Spencer et al. (2021) on the grounds of higher geothermal gradients and zircon trace element patterns (e.g., Tang et al. 2021).”
From The Grenville Province: revisiting the orogenic framework and integrating recent findings (2025) · cites this paper as Tang et al. 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Composition of Zircon and Igneous and Metamorphic Petrogenesis
Hoskin, P. W. O. (2003) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2113/0530027 · Cited by 4,781
I- and S-type granites in the Lachlan Fold Belt
CHAPPELL, B. W., & White, A. J. R. (1992) · Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · doi:10.1017/s0263593300007720 · Cited by 1,716
I- and S-type granites in the Lachlan Fold Belt
Chappell, B. W., & White, A. J. R. (1992) · Geological Society of America Special Papers · doi:10.1130/spe272-p1 · Cited by 1,270
Structure and evolution of the Himalaya–Tibet orogenic belt
Allégre, C. J., Courtillot, V., Tapponnier, P., Hirn, A., Mattauer, M., Coulon, C., Jaeger, J. J., Achache, J., Schärer, U., Marcoux, J., et al. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/307017a0 · Cited by 1,068
Kapp, P., DeCelles, P. G., Gehrels, G. E., Heizler, M., & Ding, L. (2007) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b26033.1 · Cited by 979
Andesites: Orogenic andesites and related rocks
Barton, M. (1983) · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · doi:10.1016/0377-0273(83)90135-x · Cited by 834
Chu, M., Chung, S., Song, B., et al. (2006) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g22725.1 · Cited by 610
Quantifying crustal thickness over time in magmatic arcs
Profeta, L., Ducea, M. N., Chapman, J. B., Paterson, S. R., Gonzales, S. M. H., Kirsch, M., Petrescu, L., & DeCelles, P. G. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep17786 · Cited by 552
Magmatic record of India-Asia collision
Zhu, D.-C., Wang, Q., Zhao, Z.-D., Chung, S.-L., Cawood, P. A., Niu, Y., Liu, S.-A., Wu, F.-Y., & Mo, X.-X. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14289 · Cited by 528
The Architecture, Chemistry, and Evolution of Continental Magmatic Arcs
Ducea, M. N., Saleeby, J. B., & Bergantz, G. (2015) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105049 · Cited by 524
Cited by
Orogenic quiescence in Earth’s middle age
Tang, M., Chu, X., Hao, J., & Shen, B. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf1876 · Cited by 220
Self-citationEuropium anomalies in zircon: A signal of crustal depth?
Yakymchuk, C., Holder, R. M., Kendrick, J., & Moyen, J.-F. (2023) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118405 · Cited by 79
Enigmatic Mid‐Proterozoic Orogens: Hot, Thin, and Low
Spencer, C. J., Mitchell, R. N., & Brown, M. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2021gl093312 · Cited by 73
The Grenville Province: revisiting the orogenic framework and integrating recent findings
Indares, A. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2023-0143 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, M., Ji, W.-Q., Chu, X., Wu, A., & Chen, C.
- Venue
- Geology
- Publisher
- Geological Society of America
- Published
- 2020-09-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-80
- ISSN
- 0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2682
- OpenAlex
- W3083140005
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 18.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing crustal thickness evolution from europium anomalies in detrital zircons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/g47745.1
- The paper
- Tang, M., Ji, W.-Q., Chu, X., Wu, A., & Chen, C. (2021). Reconstructing crustal thickness evolution from europium anomalies in detrital zircons. Geology. https://doi.org/10.1130/g47745.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.