Cited by 130Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications

A Machine Learning Framework for Feature Selection in Heart Disease Classification Using Improved Particle Swarm Optimization with Support Vector Machine Classifier

Vijayashree, J., Sultana, H. Parveen·2018·Programming and Computer Software

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning is used as an effective support system in health diagnosis which contains large volume of data. More commonly, analyzing such a large volume of data consumes more resources and execution time. In addition, all the features present in the dataset do not support in achieving the solution of the given problem. Hence, there is a need to use an effective feature selection algorithm for finding the more important features that contribute more in diagnosing the diseases. The Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is one of the metaheuristic algorithms to find the best solution with less time. Nowadays, PSO algorithm is not only used to select the more significant features but also removes the irrelevant and redundant features present in the dataset. However, the traditional PSO algorithm has an issue in selecting the optimal weight to update the velocity and position of the particles. To overcome this issue, this paper presents a novel function for identifying optimal weights on the basis of population diversity function and tuning function. We have also proposed a novel fitness function for PSO with the help of Support Vector Machine (SVM). The objective of the fitness function is to minimize the number of attributes and increase the accuracy. The performance of the proposed PSO-SVM is compared with the various existing feature selection algorithms such as Info gain, Chi-squared, One attribute based, Consistency subset, Relief, CFS, Filtered subset, Filtered attribute, Gain ratio and PSO algorithm. The SVM classifier is also compared with several classifiers such as Naive Bayes, Random forest and MLP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1134/s0361768818060129

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Vijayashree, J., & Sultana, H. P.
Affiliations
Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Corresponding author
Vijayashree, J.
Venue
Programming and Computer Software
Published
2018-11
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
388-397
ISSN
  • 0361-7688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1608-3261
OpenAlex
W2922256990
Cited by
130
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Programming and Computer Software (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
feature selection, heart disease classification, particle swarm optimization, support vector machine, fitness function, metaheuristic optimization, dimensionality reduction, diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review