Cited by 44Infant Health and DevelopmentPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The unsettled baby: how complexity science helps

Douglas, P. S., Hill, P. S., Brodribb, W.·2011·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

Although unsettled behaviour is a common problem in the first months of life, families complain that they receive conflicting advice from health professionals. A simplistic, biomedical approach may cause harm, because only 5% of unsettled babies have organic disturbance. However, an approach that focuses on psychosocial support may fail to diagnose correctable clinical problems, including feeding difficulty, which paradoxically risks entrenching parental anxiety and disrupted mother–child relations long term. Applied complexity science frames the mother and baby as a complex adaptive system (CAS), made up of multiple known and unknown dynamically interacting and co-evolving factors out of which cry-fuss behaviours emerge, and demands a transdisciplinary integration of evidence. Applied complexity science makes sense of the puzzling non-linear interrelationships observed between cry-fuss problems and various factors, including aversive feeding behaviours, or perinatal anxiety and depression. The CAS of the mother and baby self-organises according to inherent patterns determined by a long evolutionary history, emphasising the importance of supporting parents' trust in, and attunement with, their unsettled baby's innate capacity for self-regulation in the first months of life. The CAS of the mother and baby displays sensitivity to initial conditions, so that a small change early on may have unpredictable and disproportionate effects after an unpredictable time lag, emphasising the importance of early intervention once unsettledness emerges. …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.2010.199190

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglas, P. S., Hill, P. S., & Brodribb, W.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Douglas, P. S.
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-02-05
Volume
96
Issue
9
Pages
793-797
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2098482183
Cited by
44
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
complexity science, complex adaptive systems, mother-infant relationship, parental anxiety, infant self-regulation, early intervention, nonlinear dynamics, sensitivity to initial conditions, infant feeding problems
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adaptation, Psychological, Breast Feeding, Crying, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Care, Infant, Newborn, Irritable Mood, Mother-Child Relations, Primary Health Care, Systems Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review