Cited by 73Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Emotional, behavioural, and educational disorders in diabetic children

Open access
Gath, A, Smith, M A, Baum, J D·1980·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

This study assesses the emotional and educational status of a group of diabetic children and considers the interaction of these measurements with diabetic control. Information was collected on 76 diabetic children (43 boys and 33 girls) by means of interviews at their clinic and two questionnaires, including the Rutter B2 behavioural scale, which were completed by their schools. This information was compared with estimates of diabetic control. The mean age of these children was 10.9 years and their mean duration of diabetes 3.5 years. Information was also obtained, by means of a questionnaire completed by teachers, on a group of nondiabetic children. Psychiatric disorder was not more common in the diabetic children than in the controls, but diabetic children were more backward at reading. 20 diabetic children were at least two years behind and 6 were between one and two years behind with reading. The figures for the nondiabetic children were 10 and 1 respectively. There was a correlation between poor diabetic control and the presence of psychiatric disorder, and backwardness in reading. In 39% of diabetic children there were adverse psychosocial factors in the family background. Poor diabetic control correlated with the presence of adverse psychosocial factors. In any serious attempt at achieving diabetic control in children, attention to insulin and diet must not be divorced from attention to the domestic, scholastic, and emotional problems of the child.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.55.5.371

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gath, A., Smith, M. A., & Baum, J. D.
Affiliations
John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1980-05-01
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
371-375
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2104297124
Cited by
73
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
pediatric diabetes, emotional disorders, behavioural disorders, academic performance, glycemic control, psychosocial factors, family background, teacher ratings
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Male, Reading, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review