Cited by 76Social Media in Health EducationElectronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare Systems and Technology

Physicians who use social media and other internet-based communication technologies

Open access
Cooper, Crystale Purvis, Gelb, Cynthia A, Rim, Sun Hee, Hawkins, Nikki A, Rodriguez, Juan L, Polonec, Lindsey·2012·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

The demographic and practice-related characteristics of physicians who use social networking websites, portable devices to access the internet, email to communicate with patients, podcasts, widgets, RSS feeds, and blogging were investigated. Logistic regression was used to analyze a survey of US primary care physicians, pediatricians, obstetrician/gynecologists, and dermatologists (N=1750). Reported technology use during the last 6 months ranged from 80.6% using a portable device to access the internet to 12.9% writing a blog. The most consistent predictors of use were being male, being younger, and having teaching hospital privileges. Physician specialty, practice setting, years in practice, average number of patients treated per week, and number of physicians in practice were found to be inconsistently associated or unassociated with use of the technologies examined. Demographic characteristics, rather than practice-related characteristics, were more consistent predictors of physician use of seven internet-based communication technologies with varying levels of uptake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000628

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the general population, 59% of adult respondents to a CDC survey and 74% of respondents to a Pew survey reported use of social networking sites, with the highest rate among 18- to 29-year-olds.

    “This mirrors data from the general population, where 59% of adult respondents to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey [5] and 74% of respondents to a Pew survey [19] reported use of social networking sites, with the highest rate being among 18- to 29-year-olds”

    From Pediatric Residents’ Perceptions of Potential Professionalism Violations on Social Media: A US National Survey (2017) · cites this paper as [5]

    The cited paper reports 59.1% social-networking use among surveyed physicians, not adults in the general population (Descriptive analysis; page unavailable). Its Table 1 instead reports 49% for US adults (Discussion; page unavailable). The citation is attached to the 59% CDC-survey figure, not the separate Pew figure. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, C. P., Gelb, C. A., Rim, S. H., Hawkins, N. A., Rodriguez, J. L., & Polonec, L.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Gelb, Cynthia A
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2012-11
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
960-964
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2123954972
Cited by
76
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
physician social media use, social networking websites, podcasts, portable devices, RSS feeds, physician demographics, primary care physicians, pediatricians, obstetricians and gynecologists, dermatologists
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Health Care Surveys, Internet, Computers, Handheld, Blogging, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review