Family physicians' utility of social media: a survey comparison among family medicine residents and physicians
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Social media has become ubiquitous and has brought a dramatic change in health services. Little is known about its use by family physicians and residents for personal or professional purpose. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the utility of social media among family medicine residents and consultants. METHODS: The collection of data was through the use of a five part questionnaire developed by researchers. The questionnaire was delivered to 70 physicians and 100 residents, out of which 132questionnaires were completed, representing a 78 percent response rate. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that there was an overall high use of social media. Females used social media more for general education and professional purposes. Men, by contrast, used it more frequently for personal purposes. The participants in this study appeared to consider social media as having several useful dimensions, such as: enabling them to accomplish job tasks, improve job performance, productivity and more effective patient care when using social media. CONCLUSIONS: To date, limited studies have compared social media use among family physicians and residents. This study may serve as an initial step for future studies explaining the pattern of use among physicians.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies investigated whether participants mixed professional and personal information and activities on social media sites (blended profiles) or adopted a separation strategy (dual citizenship).
“Studies also investigated the purpose of SM use, whether participants mixed professional and personal information and activities on SM sites (blended profiles) or adopted a separation strategy where professional information and activities were clearly separated from personal ones (dual citizenship) [34,39,69,78,79,91,96,97,106].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
The Results (page unavailable) report participants’ purposes for using social media, including personal and professional use. They do not report whether participants mixed those activities on the same profiles or kept them separate; searches for blended profiles, dual citizenship, and separate professional and personal profiles found no such analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSocial media provide students, residents, and faculty a good discussion medium and an engaging way to get high-quality current information.
“SM provide for students, residents, and faculty a good discussion medium and an engaging way to get high-quality current information [79,117].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
The Results (page not available) report that respondents—family physicians and residents—found social media engaging and a great way to get high-quality current information. The paper does not establish that it is a good discussion medium or extend those survey findings to students and faculty. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExceptions were 95.4% of family medicine residents and physicians in Saudi Arabia reported having a social media account and checking them at least once a day, 93.4% of medical doctors in a Singapore hospital, and 100% of Chinese registered nurses owned a social media account.
“The exceptions were 3 studies: family medicine residents and physicians in Saudi Arabia where 95.4% of participants reported having an SM account and checking them at least once a day [79], 93.4% of medical doctors in a Singapore hospital [100], and 100% of Chinese registered nurses owned an SM account [107].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
Irfan et al's study showed females using social media more for professional purposes, and Wang et al's study, among registered nurses, was similar.
“Irfan et al’s [79] study showed females using SM more for professional purposes, and Wang et al’s [107] study, where the study population was registered nurses, was similar.”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
Significant gender differences in social media use were established in several studies.
“Significant gender differences were established in several studies [71,79,91,95,105,107].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
Irfan et al found family medicine residents and physicians used social media for personal purposes (76.0%), professional reasons (26.0%), general education (46.0%), and continuing medical education (18.2%).
“Irfan et al [79] investigated family medicine residents and physicians use of SM not only for personal purposes (76%) or professional reasons (26%); they have determined that participants also use SM for general education (46%) and in a smaller proportion (18.2%) for continuing medical education [79].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
Lack of free time or time constraint was often recognized as a barrier.
“Lack of free time or time constraint was often recognized as a barrier [39,69,74,79,91,93,96], as well as lack of knowledge or technical skills for use of SM [33,39,76,79,93,118].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
Lack of knowledge or technical skills for use of social media was often recognized as a barrier.
“Lack of free time or time constraint was often recognized as a barrier [39,69,74,79,91,93,96], as well as lack of knowledge or technical skills for use of SM [33,39,76,79,93,118].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
A lack of free time or time constraint was often recognized as a barrier to health care professionals' use of social media in the context of e-professionalism, as well as a lack of knowledge or technical skills for use of social media.
“A lack of free time or time constraint was often recognized as a barrier [39,69,74,79,91,93,96], as well as a lack of knowledge or technical skills for use of SM [33,39,76,79,93,118].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
Blurred boundaries between professional and personal spheres of social media use, with concerns about exposure of private life or separating private and professional profiles, have been presented in numerous studies in this review.
“Blurred boundaries between professional and personal spheres of SM use [34, 39, 47, 51, 69, 78, 79, 91, 96, 97, 106], with concerns about exposure of one’s private life or separating private and professional profiles have been presented in numerous studies of this review.”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
The Results and Discussion distinguish physicians’ personal from professional social media use, but do not say that the boundaries between them were blurred. The Discussion identifies time and skill as barriers; searches for privacy, exposure of private life, and separate profiles found no passage addressing those concerns. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBlurred boundaries between professional and personal spheres of social media use, with concerns about exposure of one's private life, presenting details of personal life, or separating private and professional profiles, have been presented in numerous studies in this review.
“Blurred boundaries between professional and personal spheres of SM use [34, 39, 47, 51, 69, 78, 79, 91, 96, 97, 106], with concerns about exposure of one’s private life, presenting details of personal life, or separating private and professional profiles, have been presented in numerous studies in this review.”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
The Results and Discussion distinguish physicians’ personal from professional social media use, but do not describe blurred boundaries between the two. Searches for privacy, exposure of private life, and separate profiles found no passage addressing those concerns. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in Medicine and Health Care
Grajales III, F. J., Sheps, S., Ho, K., Novak-Lauscher, H., & Eysenbach, G. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2912 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Social Media Use in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
Cheston, C. C., Flickinger, T. E., & Chisolm, M. S. (2013) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31828ffc23 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
McGowan, B. S., Wasko, M. M., Vartabedian, B. S., Miller, R. S., Freiherr, D. D., & Abdolrasulnia, M. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2138 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Dangers and Opportunities for Social Media in Medicine
GEORGE, D. R., ROVNIAK, L. S., & KRASCHNEWSKI, J. L. (2013) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0b013e318297dc38 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Reviewing social media use by clinicians: Table 1
von Muhlen, M., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey
Sandars, J., & Schroter, S. (2007) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.2007.063123 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Who’s Using PDAs? Estimates of PDA Use by Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review of Surveys
Garritty, C., & Emam, K. E. (2006) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e7 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Physician internet medical information seeking and on-line continuing education use patterns
Casebeer, L. L., Bennett, N. L., Kristofco, R. E., Carillo, A., & Centor, R. M. (2002) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.1340220105 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey
Brown, J., Ryan, C., & Harris, A. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3589 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Gholami-Kordkheili, F., Wild, V., & Strech, D. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2708 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Disaffection or expected outcomes: Understanding personal Internet use during work
Garrett, R., & Danziger, J. Ν. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00425.x · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor–patient relationship
Moubarak, G., Guiot, A., Benhamou, Y., Benhamou, A., & Hariri, S. (2011) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2010.036293 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Social media use by physicians: a qualitative study of the new frontier of medicine
Campbell, L., Evans, Y., Pumper, M., & Moreno, M. A. (2016) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0327-y · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Family physicians' information seeking behaviors: A survey comparison with other specialties
Bennett, N. L., Casebeer, L. L., Kristofco, R. E., et al. (2005) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-5-9 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Use of Social Media by Western European Hospitals: Longitudinal Study
van de Belt, T. H., Berben, S. A. A., Samsom, M., Engelen, L. J., & Schoonhoven, L. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1992 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Using Social Media to Improve Continuing Medical Education: A Survey of Course Participants
Wang, A. T., Sandhu, N. P., Wittich, C. M., Mandrekar, J. N., & Beckman, T. J. (2012) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.024 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Internet usage and user preferences in Saudi Arabia
Simsim, M. T. (2011) · Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2011.03.006 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Adilman, R., Rajmohan, Y., Brooks, E., Urgoiti, G. R., Chung, C., Hammad, N., Trinkaus, M., Naseem, M., Simmons, C., Adilman, R., et al. (2016) · Journal of Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/jop.2015.006429 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Is the digital divide between young and elderly people increasing?
Paul, G., & Stegbauer, C. (2005) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v10i10.1286 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Physicians who use social media and other internet-based communication technologies
Cooper, C. P., Gelb, C. A., Rim, S. H., Hawkins, N. A., Rodriguez, J. L., & Polonec, L. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000628 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
(2015) · PubMed · Cited by 55 · see citing works
General Practitioners' preferences and use of educational media: a German perspective
Vollmar, H. C., Rieger, M. A., Butzlaff, M. E., & Ostermann, T. (2009) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-31 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Usher, W. T. (2012) · Australian Journal of Primary Health · doi:10.1071/py10084 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
What can technology do to, and for, family medicine?
Ebell, M. H., & Frame, P. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Use of Internet Technology by Obstetricians and Family Physicians
Eitel, D. R., Yankowitz, J., & Ely, J. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1306 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Use of the internet by Italian pediatricians: habits, impact on clinical practice and expectations
Romano, M., Gesualdo, F., Pandolfi, E., et al. (2012) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-23 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [30]Sandars J Schroter S Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey Postgrad Med J 2007 83 986 759 762 18057175 PMC2750915
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vukušić Rukavina, T., Viskić, J., Machala Poplašen, L., Relić, D., Marelić, M., Jokic, D., & Sedak, K. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25770 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
“%) for continuing medical education [79].”
InfluentialAre We Witnessing a Paradigm Shift?: A Systematic Review of Social Media in Residency
Economides, J. M., Choi, Y. K., Fan, K. L., Kanuri, A. P., & Song, D. H. (2019) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000002288 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
- Authors
- Irfan, K. S., Farhana, I., Eiad, A. F., Nassr, A. M., Al Mohammed, A. Q., Maya, N., Ali, A. H., MA, A. A., Gominda, P., & Cees van der, V.
- Affiliations
- King Saud University (SA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- African Health Sciences
- Publisher
- African Journals Online (AJOL)
- Published
- 2018-08-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 817
- ISSN
- 1680-6905 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6307000
- OpenAlex
- W2885023218
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- African Health Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- social media use, general practitioners, family medicine residents, physician productivity, employee performance, patient care, gender differences in social media use
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Family, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review