Cited by 17Social Media in Health EducationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsInnovations in Medical Education

Family physicians' utility of social media: a survey comparison among family medicine residents and physicians

Open access
Irfan, Karim Syed, Farhana, Irfan, Eiad, Al Faris, Nassr, Al Maflehi, Al Mohammed, Al Qahtani, Maya, Nadeem, Ali, Al Hazmi, MA, Ahmed Abdullah +2 more·2018·African Health Sciences

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Social media has become ubiquitous and has brought a dramatic change in health services. Little is known about its use by family physicians and residents for personal or professional purpose. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the utility of social media among family medicine residents and consultants. METHODS: The collection of data was through the use of a five part questionnaire developed by researchers. The questionnaire was delivered to 70 physicians and 100 residents, out of which 132questionnaires were completed, representing a 78 percent response rate. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that there was an overall high use of social media. Females used social media more for general education and professional purposes. Men, by contrast, used it more frequently for personal purposes. The participants in this study appeared to consider social media as having several useful dimensions, such as: enabling them to accomplish job tasks, improve job performance, productivity and more effective patient care when using social media. CONCLUSIONS: To date, limited studies have compared social media use among family physicians and residents. This study may serve as an initial step for future studies explaining the pattern of use among physicians.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4314/ahs.v18i3.41

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies investigated whether participants mixed professional and personal information and activities on social media sites (blended profiles) or adopted a separation strategy (dual citizenship).

    “Studies also investigated the purpose of SM use, whether participants mixed professional and personal information and activities on SM sites (blended profiles) or adopted a separation strategy where professional information and activities were clearly separated from personal ones (dual citizenship) [34,39,69,78,79,91,96,97,106].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Results (page unavailable) report participants’ purposes for using social media, including personal and professional use. They do not report whether participants mixed those activities on the same profiles or kept them separate; searches for blended profiles, dual citizenship, and separate professional and personal profiles found no such analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social media provide students, residents, and faculty a good discussion medium and an engaging way to get high-quality current information.

    “SM provide for students, residents, and faculty a good discussion medium and an engaging way to get high-quality current information [79,117].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Results (page not available) report that respondents—family physicians and residents—found social media engaging and a great way to get high-quality current information. The paper does not establish that it is a good discussion medium or extend those survey findings to students and faculty. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exceptions were 95.4% of family medicine residents and physicians in Saudi Arabia reported having a social media account and checking them at least once a day, 93.4% of medical doctors in a Singapore hospital, and 100% of Chinese registered nurses owned a social media account.

    “The exceptions were 3 studies: family medicine residents and physicians in Saudi Arabia where 95.4% of participants reported having an SM account and checking them at least once a day [79], 93.4% of medical doctors in a Singapore hospital [100], and 100% of Chinese registered nurses owned an SM account [107].”
  • Irfan et al's study showed females using social media more for professional purposes, and Wang et al's study, among registered nurses, was similar.

    “Irfan et al’s [79] study showed females using SM more for professional purposes, and Wang et al’s [107] study, where the study population was registered nurses, was similar.”
  • Significant gender differences in social media use were established in several studies.

    “Significant gender differences were established in several studies [71,79,91,95,105,107].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Sandars J Schroter S Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey Postgrad Med J 2007 83 986 759 762 18057175 PMC2750915

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irfan, K. S., Farhana, I., Eiad, A. F., Nassr, A. M., Al Mohammed, A. Q., Maya, N., Ali, A. H., MA, A. A., Gominda, P., & Cees van der, V.
Affiliations
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
African Health Sciences
Published
2018-08-15
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
817
ISSN
1680-6905 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885023218
Cited by
17
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • African Health Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
social media use, general practitioners, family medicine residents, physician productivity, employee performance, patient care, gender differences in social media use
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Family, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review